Petitioner in a Section 138 NI Act complaint challenged a trial court order declining to exhibit electronic documents. The High Court found no irregularity, dismissed the petition, but left open adducing the evidence per Section 65-A with one effective opportunity.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:26749]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 4043/2024
Jitendra Rao S/o Champa Lal Rao, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Vaishnav Colony, Chandana Bhakar, Jodhpur,raj.
----Petitioner
Versus
Dhiraj Acharaya S/o Nand Kishore Acharya, R/o Ram Nagar, Nayapura, Hand Pump Wali Gali, Chokha, Jodhpur,raj.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hari Singh Rajpurohit. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Gaurav Singh, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA Order
03/07/2024
[2024:RJ-JD:26749]
[CRLMP-4043/2024]
(2 of 2)
(ARUN MONGA),J
Whether fit for reporting : Yes / No
51-Rmathur/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the trial court rightly refused to exhibit electronic documents absent a Section 65B certificate and an application for secondary evidence?
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Jitendra Rao S/o Champa Lal Rao
Dhiraj Acharaya S/o Nand Kishore Acharya
Arun Monga
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
