Justice Farjand Ali distinguished the case from Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab regarding a Section 307 IPC charge. The court directioned the trial court to conclude the trial at the earliest and noted the potential for a lenient view at sentencing.
Direction to conclude trial at the earliest and expect lenient view at sentencing stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:10718]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 381/2024
Rajan Goyal S/o Chandra Prakash Goyal, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Harijan Basti Ratanada Jodhpur Rajasthan
----Petitioner
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Jitendra Parasariya |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Mukktiyar Khan, PP Mr. Sourabh Soni |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Order
04/03/2024
[2024:RJ-JD:10718]
[CRLMP-381/2024]
(2 of 2)
(FARJAND ALI),J
460-Samvedana/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the present case falls within the purview of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab regarding bail/legal impediments.
How to dispose of the criminal miscellaneous petition regarding a Section 307 IPC charge.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Gian Singh Vs. State of PunjabDistinguished¶13
Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rajan Goyal
State Of Rajasthan
Devendra
Farjand Ali
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
