The Rajasthan High Court at Jaipur dismissed a criminal miscellaneous petition seeking security and protection from private respondents, holding that the prayer had rendered the petition infructuous due to the passage of time.
The petition for security and protection was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:93]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 353/2020
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Govind Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Laxman Meena, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order
02/01/2024
(2 of 2)
[CRLMP-353/2020]
[2024:RJ-JP:93]
infructuous.
(SUDESH BANSAL), J
SOURAV /NITIN/23
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petition for security and protection remains maintainable.
Whether the petition has become infructuous.
Madina D/o Ahsanulak
Saifali Khan
State Of Rajasthan
Sudesh Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
