The petition under Section 482 CrPC challenging an order in revision was dismissed as infructuous because the main criminal case was finally decided on 07.02.2017 with the accused persons being acquitted by the trial court.
The special leave petition was dismissed as having become infructuous due to the acquittal in the main case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:15767]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2905/2013
----Accused-Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Deen Dayal Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Suresh Kumar, PP Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order
03/04/2024
(2 of 2)
[2024:RJ-JP:15767]
[CRLMP-2905/2013]
No.83 dated 03.04.2024, it has been informed that the main case itself has been finally decided on 07.02.2017 and accused persons have been acquitted by extending benefit of doubt. The letter is taken on record.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J
NITIN /405
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the special leave petition challenging the dismissal of revision petition infructuous after acquittal in main case.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Veer Singh S/o Shri Phatte Singh
Siya S/o Shri Ratti
State Of Rajasthan
Shahb Singh S/o Shri Shiv Charan
Sudesh Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
