Accused sought quashing of criminal proceedings for offences under Sections 420 and 406 IPC arising from a protest petition on FIR No.457/2005 concerning misuse of cheques. Counsel did not press the petition; it was dismissed with liberty to raise objections before the trial Court, which was directed to expedite the pending trial.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:6355]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2758/2017
Ram Kumar Singh Son Of Madho Singh, By Caste Rajput, R/o Post Muhana, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Santosh Kumar Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Atul Sharma, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order
07/02/2024
[2024:RJ-JP:6355]
[CRLMP-2758/2017]
(2 of 2)
(SUDESH BANSAL),J
RONAK /599
1 issue framed by the court
Whether criminal proceedings based on cognizance in a protest petition should be quashed under Section 482 CrPC.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Ram Kumar Singh Son Of Madho Singh
Rana Ram Son Of Man Singh
The State Of Rajasthan
Sudesh Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
