The Court allowed a criminal miscellaneous petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash an FIR and subsequent proceedings based on a compromise between the parties, relying on the ratio of Gian Singh.
The FIR No.0004/2023 and all consequential proceedings for offences under Section 420 IPC and Sections 66C & 66D of Information Technology Act were quashed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:27677]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 2498/2024
Irshad S/o Shri Hasan Mohammed, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Village Sigar, Nagla (Jera Kheda), New Haryana.
----Petitioner
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Firoz Khan. |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Gaurav Singh, PP. |
| Mr. Rajesh Choudhary. |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
Order
09/07/2024
[2024:RJ-JD:27677]
[CRLMP-2498/2024]
(2 of 2)
impugned FIR and all consequential proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise.
(ARUN MONGA),J
18-/Jitender//-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the FIR and consequential proceedings can be quashed upon submission of compromise between parties.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr.Applied¶15
Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr. [(2012) 10 SCC 303] · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Irshad S/o Shri Hasan Mohammed
State Of Rajasthan
Amritpal Singh S/o Shri Mahendra Singh
Arun Monga
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Arun Monga
Parties & counsel
