Sandeep Berad and Anr. v. State of Rajasthan and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court disposed of a miscellaneous petition seeking to quash an FIR registered under various IPC sections, including 498A, noting that ten years had elapsed since registration and granting liberty to plead at the trial stage if the case remains pending.
What did the court decide?
Miscellaneous petition disposed of with liberty to raise averments at trial stage if case is pending.
What the court decided
[2024:RJ-JP:43394]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2360/2016
- Sandeep Berad S/o Sh. Mangturam Berad R/o Shahuwala, Sh. Ganganagar (Raj.) at present posted at Alwar.
- Mangturam S/o Sh. Bhuraram Berad R/o 3H Bada Madera, Sh. Ganganagar (Raj.).
----Petitioners
Versus
- State Of Rajasthan through PP
- Anjana Saharawat W/o Sh. Sandeep Berad D/o Sh. Jaiveer Singh R/o 204, Nehru Nagar, Alwar presently 96Am Surya Nagar, Ganesh Marg, Gopalpura Byepass, Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, Dy. G.A
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA Order
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the Criminal Miscellaneous Petition for quashing of FIR should be disposed of given the lapse of 10 years since registration.
Whether the petitioners are entitled to liberty to plead during trial if the case remains pending.
Whether the delay bars the limited relief of quashing the FIR in matrimonial offences.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sandeep Berad
- petitioner
Mangturam Berad
- respondent
State Of Rajasthan
- respondent
Anjana Saharawat
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMP/2360/2016
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court