Accused-petitioners sought quashing of FIR No.383/2023 under Sections 332, 353 and 382 IPC after entering into a compromise with the complainant during investigation. The Court found the compromise undisputed and, following Gian Singh and Bhajan Lal, quashed the FIR and all consequential proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:7975]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 209/2024
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Tiwari For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.K. Sheoran, PP Mr. Mahesh Chand Gautam
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order
15/02/2024
(2 of 2)
[2024:RJ-JP:7975]
[CRLMP-209/2024]
[ AIR 1992 SC 604 ], the aforesaid FIR is liable to be quashed in view of compromise arrived at between the parties.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J
163-Nirmala
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an FIR for offences under Sections 332, 353 and 382 IPC can be quashed on the basis of a compromise between the accused and the complainant.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr.Applied
2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934
State of Haryana & Ors. Vs. Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors.Applied
AIR 1992 SC 604 · Who else cites this
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Virendra
Purshottam Saini
Manmohan Saini
Lokesh Kumar Yadav
Shivam
State of Rajasthan
Anil Kumar Upman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
