Petitioners moved to quash an FIR. The court dismissed the petition as infructuous because a negative final report was filed by the Investigating Officer, leaving no case against the petitioners.
Petition for quashing of FIR and stay petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:33274]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. (Pet.) No. 1945/2023
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Nonepresent. |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Arun Kumar, PP. Mr. Love Jain, for the respondent |
| No.2. |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA PRAKASH SONI
Order
08/08/2024
(2 of 2) [CRLMP-1945/2023]
[2024:RJ-JD:33274]
(RAJENDRA PRAKASH SONI),J
288-Mohan/-
Suryakanta Mali
Mahendra Singh Chouhan
Prasant Chouhan
State of Rajasthan
Bhupendra Khatri
Rajendra Prakash Soni
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
