On a criminal miscellaneous petition, the High Court observed that no prima facie case was made out against the petitioners under Sections 498-A, 406, and 323 IPC. Consequently, bail was granted to the appellants.
Bail granted to the petitioners in the underlying matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:27813]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 1923/2022
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mahipal Bishnoi, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT
Order
09/07/2024
f}rh; jkmaM esa ;kph dh vksj ls dksbZ mifLFkr ugha gSA iwoZ is'kh fnukad 22-12-2023 dks Hkh ;kph dh vksj ls dksbZ mifLFkr ugha FkkA
;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd us dk;kZy; Fkkukf/kdkjh iqfyl Fkkuk efgyk iwoZ] vk;qDrky;] tks/kiqj ls izkIr rF;kRed fjiksVZ fnukafdr 02-08-2023 is'k dj crk;k fd bl ekeys esa dsoy ;kph la[;k 1 Hkkos'k dqekj ds fo#) tqeZ /kkjk 498,] 406 o 323 Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk esa vijk/k izekf.kr ik;k tkdj fnukad 11-07-2022 dks pkyku U;k;ky; esa is'k fd;k tk pqdk gSA vU; ;kphx.k ds fo#) vijk/k izekf.kr ugha ik;k x;k gSA izLrqr fjiksVZ dks fjdkWMZ ij fy;k tkrk gSA
[2024:RJ-JD:27813]
[CRLMP-1923/2022]
(2 of 2)
bl ekeys esa izdj.k ds rF;ksa] ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa izdj.k dk xq.kkoxq.k ij foospu fd;s fcuk ;g vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;kph la[;k 01 ;kfpdk esa fn;s x;s vk/kkjksa dks fo}ku v/khuLFk U;k;ky; esa pktZ dh LVst ij rFkk fopkj.k ds nkSjku mBk;s tkus ds fy;s Lora= jgsxkA bl fVIi.kh ¼Observation½ ds lkFk ;g ;kfpdk fuLrkfjr dh tkrh gSA rn~uqlkj LFkxu izkFkZuk i= dk Hkh fuLrkj.k fd;k tkrk gSA
(YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT),J
236-GauravG/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether prima facie case exists under Sections 498-A, 406, and 323 IPC regarding the petitioners.
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioners in view of the lack of sufficient evidence to constitute a prima facie case.
3 provisions across 1 enactments
Bhavesh Kumar S/o Shri Kishori Lal
Kishori Lal S/o Late Shri Anandi Lal
Smt. Padma Devi W/o Shri Kishori Lal
State Of Rajasthan
Sweety D/o Anil Kumar Shrimali
Yogendra Kumar Purohit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
