Accused-petitioner had challenged cognizance taken under Sections 342, 323 and 354 IPC in FIR No.36/2014. On his application citing family settlement of the underlying dispute, permission to withdraw was granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn and interim stay vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:25567]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1659/2019
Sajjan Singh S/o Shri Bux Singh, R/o Nai Mandi Road, Dausa, Presently R/o Plot No.t-3, Apna Ashiana Second, Near Peethawas School, Govindpura, Kalwar Road, Jaipur.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Banwari Singh for |
|---|---|
| Mr. Siddharth Bapna | |
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Laxman Meena, PP |
| Mr. Ritesh Jain |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order
29/05/2024
[2024:RJ-JP:25567]
[CRLMP-1659/2019]
(SUDESH BANSAL),J
RONAK /408
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition challenging the cognizance order should be permitted to be withdrawn after settlement between the parties.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sajjan Singh
State of Rajasthan
Smt. Keshar Kanwar
Sudesh Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
