The Rajasthan High Court dismissed a criminal miscellaneous petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking directions for fair investigation, holding that the alternative remedy of approaching the concerned Magistrate under Section 156(3) CrPC is available.
The criminal miscellaneous petition for directions under Section 482 CrPC is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:7515]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 159/2024
Fahed Khan S/o Shri Firoz Khan, Aged About 36 Years, R/o 60-C, Wakf Nagar, Dadabadi, Kota.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shamsudin Ansari For Respondent(s) : Mr. Chandragupt Chopra, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order
13/02/2024
(2 of 2)
[CRLMP-159/2024]
[2024:RJ-JP:7515]
(SUDESH BANSAL),J
NITIN /103
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a high court should exercise suo-moto jurisdiction to direct fair investigation under Section 482 CrPC when alternative remedy exists.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sakiri Vasu Vs. State of Uttar PradeshReferred¶3
(2008) 2 SCC 409 · Who else cites this
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Fahed Khan
State Of Rajasthan
Sudesh Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
