The court recorded that the petitioner's counsel withdrew the criminal miscellaneous petition under Section 482 Cr.PC seeking quashing of an FIR, accepting the petitioner's ongoing implication in the investigation proceedings.
Criminal miscellaneous petition dismissed as not pressed with observations made by the court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:12774]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1470/2024
Pramod Meena S/o Rameshchand Meena, R/o Village Udaypura, Police Station Khedli, District Alwar
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. |
Niraj Pal | Singh Yadav |
|---|---|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. |
Laxman | Meena, PP |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order
14/03/2024
(2 of 2)
[2024:RJ-JP:12774]
[CRLMP-1470/2024]
Cr.PC have also been initiated, in order to ensure the presence of petitioner before the trial Court.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J
Sachin/22
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the criminal miscellaneous petition under Section 482 Cr.PC seeking quashing of an FIR should be allowed when the petitioner requests withdrawal without pressing the application.
What consequence follows from the petitioner's counsel withdrawing the petition on instructions.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Pramod Meena
State Of Rajasthan
Namay Singh
SUDESH BANSAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
