Petitioner sought quashing of criminal proceedings. Court quashed proceedings based on victim's testimony exonerating petitioner in the midst of trial, directing trial court to conclude trial within six months.
Quashing of proceedings regarding Sessions Case No. 183/2021 pending against the petitioner; expectation for trial conclusion within six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:29454]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 1452/2022
Arin @ Happy S/o Sh. Udai Ram, Aged About 18 Years, B/c Jat, R/o Type/2-50, Anu Kiran Colony, Rawatbhata, Dist. Chittorgarh (Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Chaitanya Gahlot Ms. Vandana For Respondent(s) : Mr. Gaurav Singh, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
Order (Oral)
19/07/2024
[2024:RJ-JD:29454]
[CRLMP-1452/2022]
(2 of 2)
invocation of Section 307 IPC, he himself has stated before the learned trial court that the injuries suffered by him are not attributed to the petitioner and he has no role qua the same.
(ARUN MONGA),J
1-skm/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the proceedings pending against the petitioner for the alleged offences can be quashed given the testimony of the victim exonerating the petitioner and the stage of the trial?
What is the time limit within which the trial court should conclude the pending trial?
Arin @ Happy S/o Sh. Udai Ram
State Of Rajasthan
Sh. Mukesh Kumar
Sh. Peeyush
Arun Monga
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
