This bench dismissed a Section 482 Cr.P.C. petition for quashing an FIR as infructuous. The lower court had already disposed of the criminal case involving theft and cheating offences based on a compromise.
The petition was dismissed as having become infructuous due to the compromise order disposing of the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:50107]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1229/2017
Raghuveer Son Of Shri Sonyaram, R/o Village Mamchali, Thana Sadar, District Karauli, Raj.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR
Order
05/12/2024
[2024:RJ-JP:50107]
[CRLMP-1229/2017]
the offences punishable under Sections 143 and 448 IPC in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karauli.
(ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J
TANISHA /54
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petition for quashing of the FIR should be allowed given that the underlying criminal case has been disposed of via a compromise order.
What is the impact of a settlement discharge on the maintainability of a Section 482 Cr.P.C. petition?
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Raghuveer Son Of Shri Sonyaram
State of Rajasthan Through P.P.
Maya Devi Wife Of Late Shri Rambhrosi
Ashutosh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
