Allowed

Smt. Sunita @ Kali Sansi W/O Surendra Alias Dudyo, v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC15 Feb 2024CRLMB/990/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed a bail application filed by the accused under Section 439 Cr.P.C. She was charged with offences under the NDPS Act and Rajasthan Excise Act. The Court deemed it just and proper to release her on bail, noting the recovery was below commercial quantity, subject to a personal bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 with two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each, subject to appearance stipulations.

Smt. Sunita @ Kali Sansi W/O Surendra Alias Dudyo, Vs… — Narcotics (NDPS) | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:7822]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

¶4

990/2024

¶5

Smt. Sunita @ Kali Sansi W/o Surendra Alias Dudyo, Aged About 45 Years, Resident Near Railway Station, Sansi Basti, Bhagwan Ganj, Police Station Clock Tower, Ajmer, At Present Sahsara Sansi Ka Makan, Bhojpura Kacchi Basti, 22 Godam, Police Station Ashok Nagar. (At Present Accused Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur.)

¶6

----Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nirmal Kumar Sharma, Adv. For : Mr. S.S. Mehla, P.P. Respondent(s)

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order

¶12

15/02/2024

¶13

This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in FIR No.18/2024 registered at Police Station Ashok Nagar, District Jaipur City (South) for the offence(s) under Section(s) 8/20, 8/21, 8/25 of NDPS Act & 19/54 of the Rajasthan Excise Act.

[2024:RJ-JP:7822]

(2 of 3)

[CRLMB-990/2024]

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner is innocent and she has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel further submits that the alleged contraband recovered in the present case is less than commercial quantity. Learned counsel also submits that chargesheet has already been filed, the accused-petitioner has been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

¶18

Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the bail application.

¶19

Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the recovery of alleged contraband in the present case is less than commercial quantity, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶20

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that accused-petitioner Smt. Sunita @ Kali Sansi W/o Surendra Alias Dudyo shall be released on bail, provided she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each

¶21

[2024:RJ-JP:7822] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-990/2024]

¶22

to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶23

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶24

YOGESH KUMAR /69

Smt. Sunita @ Kali Sansi W/O Surendra Alias Dudyo, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Sunita @ Kali Sansi W/O Surendra Alias Dudyo, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashok Kumar Khatana S/O Shri Dayaram Khatana Vs State of Rajasthan

Ajju S/O Nasiyat @ Naset Vs State of Rajasthan

Ashok Meena S/O Shri Rambharosi Vs State of Rajasthan

Satveer Son of Shivhari Vs State of Rajasthan

Suresh S/O Shri Rajajram Vs State of Rajasthan

Hansraj S/O Gyarsaram Vs the State of Rajasthan