Allowed

Madan Nath @ Gadedi v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC23 Aug 2024CRLMB/9868/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Jodhpur allowed the bail application of the accused lodged in police custody. The court made no comment on merits but held it just and proper to grant bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The accused was directed to furnish a personal bond with two sureties for his appearance.

What did the court decide?

Accused enlarged on bail with personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- and two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each.

Madan Nath @ Gadedi Vs State of Rajasthan — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JD:35111]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9868/2024

¶4

Madan Nath @ Gadedi S/o Shri Sowan Nath, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Kachchi Basti, Indira Colony, P.s. Goverdhan Vilas, Tehsil Girwa, Dist. Udaipur,raj. (Lodged In Sub Jail, Aburoad)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Shambhoo Singh
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Narendra Gehlot,PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT

¶11

Order

¶12

23/08/2024

¶13

The instant bail application has been filed by the applicant Madan Nath @ Gadedi S/o Sowan Nath under Section 439 Cr.P.C. against the order impugned passed by learned court below in connection with FIR No.193/2024 registered at Police Station Aburoad City District Sirohit for the offence(s) under Sections 457, 380 and 411 IPC.

¶14

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the case. He submits that challan has been filed. Learned counsel further submits that the applicant is behind the bars and trial may take long time to conclude thus, he deserves to be enlarged on bail.

¶15

Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application.

¶16

Considering the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties, and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the

(2 of 2)

[2024:RJ-JD:35111]

[CRLMB-9868/2024]

case, without commenting on the merits and demerits of the case, this court deems it just and proper to enlarge the applicant on bail.

¶21

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-applicant shall be enlarged on bail in the aforesaid FIR provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned Lower Court for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.

¶22

(YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT),J

¶23

83-Arti/-

Madan Nath @ Gadedi v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Madan Nath @ Gadedi v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shrawan Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Ranchodaram Vs State of Rajasthan

Dhirendra Kumar Garg @ Dhirendra Shastri Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramu Nath Vs State of Rajasthan

Dileep Vs State of Rajasthan

Lal Shankar Vs State of Rajasthan