Dismissed

Yuvraj S/O Sh. Jaiveer Singh Shekhawat v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC21 Aug 2024CRLMB/9827/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In three merged criminal bail applications, the High Court rejected bail for the accused stating they made payment of ₹4.48 lakh to the victim without clarifying repayment of arrears, and evidence regarding the complainant's statement is material for the trial.

What did the court decide?

Bail applications for the petitioners were dismissed. The petitioners are to remain in judicial custody.

Yuvraj S/O Sh. Jaiveer Singh Shekhawat Vs State of Rajasthan — Rajasthan HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:35169]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9827/2024

¶4

Yuvraj S/o Sh. Jaiveer Singh Shekhawat, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Dhani Karaudi Tan Rajnauta, Police Station Pragpura, District Kotputli. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

Connected With

¶10

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9944/2024

¶11

Deepak Kumar Meena S/o Bodan Lal Meena, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Gram Jhakhdi, Police Station Thanagaji, Alwar (Raj.). (Presently Confined In Central Jail At Jaipur)

¶12

----Petitioner

¶13

Versus

¶14

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶15

----Respondent

¶16

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10270/2024

¶17

Deepak Kumar Meena S/o Shri Bharat Ram Meena, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Bhakri, Tan Veer Tejaji Nagar, Police Station Pragpura, District Kotputli, Rajasthan. (Presently Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur).

¶18

Ratan Lal Meena @ Tannu S/o Shri Prahlad Meena, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Bhakri, Tan Veer Tejaji Nagar, Police Station Pragpura, District Kotputli, Rajasthan. (Presently Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur).

¶19

----Petitioners

¶20

Versus

¶21

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶22

----Respondent

¶23

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anil Mahala Mr. Rajendra Singh Tanwar Mr. D K Dixit For Respondent(s) : Amit Kumar Gupta, PP

(2 of 3)

[2024:RJ-JP:35169]

[CRLMB-9827/2024]

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA

¶28

Order

¶29

21/08/2024

¶30

mDr rhuksa izkFkZuki= ,d gh izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ls lacaf/kr gksus ds dkj.k budk fuLrkj.k ,d lkFk fd;k tk jgk gSA

¶31

izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls /kkjk 483 Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk ds izko/kkuksa ds vUrxZr iqfyl Fkkuk pkdlw] ftyk&t;iqj 'kgj nf{k.k esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 296@2024 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 457] 380 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk esa tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus gsrq mDr rhuksa izkFkZuki= is”k fd;s x;s gSaA

¶32

cgl lquh xbZA fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZx.k dks izdj.k esa feF;k lafyIr fd;k x;k gSA izkFkhZx.k ij xksnke ls 134 dV~Vs pus pksjh djus ds vijk/k dk vfHk;ksx gSA izkFkhZx.k fnukad 18-07-2024 ls vfHkj{kk esa gS rFkk muds laca/k esa vUos"k.k Hkh iw.kZ gks pqdk gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ;qojkt ds fo:) iwoZ dk 01 vkijkf/kd izdj.k rFkk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr nhid iq= Hkjryky ds fo:) iwoZ ds 02 vkijkf/kd izdj.k lafLFkr gSa rFkk 'ks"k izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k nhid iq= cksnuyky o jruyky eh.kk ds fo:) iwoZ dk dksbZ izdj.k lafLFkr ugha gSA izdj.k eftLVªsV U;k;ky; }kjk fopkj.kh; gSA izdj.k ds vUos"k.k vkSj vUoh{kk esa le; yxsxkA vr% izkFkhZx.k dks tekur dk ykHk iznku fd;k tkosA

¶33

blds foijhr ;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k us [kljk la[;k 2311@13 xkao dksFkwu] rg0 pkdlw] t;iqj esa fLFkr ifjoknh ds xksnke dk rkyk rksM+dj 134 dV~Vs pus pksjh fd;s gSaA izdj.k esa vHkh vU; vfHk;qDrx.k Qjkj gS] ftudh ryk'k dh tkdj vUos"k.k fd;k tkuk gS rFkk izdj.k esa cjkenxh dh tkuh 'ks"k gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo:) xEHkhj vijk/kksa dk vfHk;ksx gSA vr% vijk/k dh xEHkhjrk dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, tekur izkFkZuki= fujLr fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶34

izLrqr rdksZa ij euu fd;kA dsl Mk;jh dk /;kuiwoZd voyksdu fd;k x;kA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k ij ifjoknh ds xksnke dk rkyk rksM+dj 134 dV~Vs pus pksjh djus ds vijk/k dk vfHk;ksx gSA vUos"k.k ls ;g ik;k x;k gS fd vfHk;qDrx.k

[2024:RJ-JP:35169]

[CRLMB-9827/2024]

(3 of 3)

us mDr pksjh'kqnk eky 4]48]000 :i;s esa cspku dj fn;kA vHkh vU; vfHk;qDrx.k Qjkj gSa] ftudh ryk'k dj muls vUos"k.k fd;k tkuk rFkk izdj.k esa cjkenxh 'ks"k gksuk crk;k x;k gSA izdj.k esa vHkh vuqla/kku tkjh gSA mi;qZDr leLr rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks /;ku eas j[krs gq, bl izdze ij izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr izrhr ugha gksrk gSA

¶39

ifj.kkeLo:i izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls /kkjk 483 Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk ds izko/kkuksa ds vUrxZr izLrqr mDr rhuksa tekur izkFkZuk i= fujLr fd;s tkrs gSaA

¶40

(SHUBHA MEHTA),J

¶41

VISHAL SHARMA /250-252

Yuvraj S/O Sh. Jaiveer Singh Shekhawat v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yuvraj S/O Sh. Jaiveer Singh Shekhawat v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashok S/O Shri Motiram Vs State of Rajasthan

Smt. Sunita W/O Omprakash Vs State of Rajasthan

Sunit Sharma @ Abhishek Sharma S/O Late Shri Bijendra Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Amir Hussain S/O Aabid Hussain Vs State of Rajasthan

Netaram S/O Bhuraram Vs State of Rajasthan

Charat Alias Charatlal S/O Prabhu Vs State of Rajasthan