Allowed

Jeetaram Urf Jeetender Urf Jeetu v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC23 Aug 2024CRLMB/9610/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants bail to two petitioners facing charges of mischief. The High Court observed the trial court to be impartial and the case pending in Doha Zilla Jail, thus fixing bail for both under specific sections of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted to the petitioners on the condition that they appear before the court on a specific date.

Jeetaram Urf Jeetender Urf Jeetu Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JD:35120]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9610/2024

¶4

Jeetaram Urf Jeetender Urf Jeetu S/o Shanker Ram, Aged About 27 Years, Village Aakrali, Tehsil Pachpadra, Distt. Balotra. (At Present Lodged In Distt. Jail Barmer)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

Connected With

¶10

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9611/2024 Pawan S/o Rana Ram, Aged About 23 Years, Village Lakheti Beri, P.s. Pachpadra, Distt. Balotra.

¶11

(At Present Lodged In Distt. Jail Barmer)

¶12

----Petitioner

¶13

Versus

¶14

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶15

----Respondent

¶16

For Petitioner(s)	: Dr. Kshamendra Mathur
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Lalit Kishore Sen,PP

¶17

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT Order

¶18

23/08/2024

¶19

01izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls tekur dk ;g vkosnu vUrxZr /kkjk 483 ch,u,l,l iqfyl Fkkuk ck;rq ftyk ckM+esj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 65@2024] vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 309¼6½] 140¼3½] 127¼2½] 115¼2½] 109¼1½] 189¼2½ ch,u,l ,oa 3¼1½¼E½] 3¼2½¼V½] 3¼2½¼VA½ vuqlwfpr tkfr ,oa vuqlwfpr tutkfr ¼vR;kpkj fuokj.k½ izdj.k vf/kfu;e] 1989 ds ekeys esa izLrqr gqvk gSA 02geus cgl tekur vkosnu lquh rFkk miyC/k vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;kA

¶20

03fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dk rdZ gS fd bl ekeys esa ikfjokfjd >xM+k gksus ls >wBk eqdnek ntZ djok;k x;k gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr iou ds

[2024:RJ-JD:35120]

[CRLMB-9610/2024]

(2 of 2)

fo:) ek= ,d izdj.k ntZ gSA bl ekeys esa dksbZ xaHkhj pksV vkgr ds vkuk ugha ik;k x;k gSA nksuksa izkFkhZx.k vuqlwfpr tkfr ds lnL; gSA ftuds fo:) vuqlwfpr tkfr ,oa vuqlwfpr tutkfr ¼vR;kpkj fuokj.k½ izdj.k vf/kfu;e ds vkjksi ugha gSA izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k fnukad 05-07-2024 ls U;kf;d vfHkj{kk esa py jgs gSaA fopkj.k esa le; yxus dh lEHkkouk gSA bu vk/kkjksa ij izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dks tekur ij fjgk fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dhA

¶25

04blds foijhr ;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd us tekur vkosnu dk fojks/k fd;kA

¶26

05tekur vkosnu ij euu fd;k] i=koyh o dsl Mk;jh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA pksV izfrosnu izi= ds eqrkfcd dksbZ xaHkhj pksV vkuk ugha crk;k x;k gSA lk/kkj.k izd`fr dh o dqan gfFk;kj ls pksV vkuk vkgr djukjke ds pksV izfrosnu esa ik;k x;k gSA izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k fnukad 05-07-2024 ls U;kf;d vfHkj{kk esa py jgs gSaA fopkj.k esa le; yxus dh lEHkkouk ls budkj ugha fd;k tk ldrkA

¶27

06cgl esa mBk;s x;s fcUnqvksa ,oa vfHkys[k ij miyC/k lkexzh dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk tqeZ dh izd`fr o ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dks bl U;k;ky; dh jk; esa tekur ij fjgk fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶28

07ifj.kker% tekur vkosnu vUrxZr /kkjk 483 ch,u,l,l Lohdkj fd;k tkdj vkns”k fn;k tkrk gS fd izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k 1- thrkjke mQZ thrsUnz mQZ thrw iq= 'kadjjke] 2- iou iq= jkuk jke mi;qZDr izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ds ekeys esa v/khuLFk U;k;ky; esa viuh fu;fer mifLFkfr ds laca/k esa izR;sd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ,d yk[k :i;s dk eqpydk ,oa ;ksX; v/khuLFk U;k;ky; ds larks’kizn ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks tekur izLrqr dj rLnhd djk ns rks mUgsa bl izdj.k esa tekur ij rqjar fjgk dj fn;k tkosaA

¶29

(YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT),J

¶30

75-76--S N LOHRA/-

Jeetaram Urf Jeetender Urf Jeetu v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jeetaram Urf Jeetender Urf Jeetu v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shrawan Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Ranchodaram Vs State of Rajasthan

Dhirendra Kumar Garg @ Dhirendra Shastri Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramu Nath Vs State of Rajasthan

Dileep Vs State of Rajasthan

Lal Shankar Vs State of Rajasthan