Anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the new criminal code in a cheating and breach of trust case. The court found no false implication or abusive circumstances on the case diary, held the alleged agreement had no legal value, and dismissed the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:38233]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9498/2024
Sh. Mangeram S/o Sh. Arjunram, R/o Ward No. 9, Sabuwana, A- Samb Sabuana, Hanumangarh, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Narendra Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jai Prakash Tiwari, P.P. Mr. Vidhut Kumar Gupta
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Order
09/09/2024
izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ekaxsjke dh vksj ls v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns”k fnukad 22-07-2024 ds fo:) ;g izkFkZuk i= vUrxZr /kkjk 482 Hkkjrh; U;k; lafgrk] mls iqfyl Fkkuk fo/kk;diqjh] t;iqj 'kgj nf{k.k esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k &80@2024] vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 420] 406 ,oa 120 ch Hkk0na0la0 esa vfxze tekur iznku fd;s tkus ds laca/k esa izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA
cgl lquh xbZA
;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dk rdZ jgk gS fd izkFkhZ funksZ"k gS] izkFkhZ dks bl izdj.k esa feF;k vkfyIr fd;k x;k gSA izkFkhZ ds fo:) dksbZ Hkh izR;{k lk{; ugha gSA mudk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd ifjoknh jkgqy lksuh ds iq= ruqt lksuh ds lkFk mudk jkthukek gks pqdk gSA izdj.k esa vfHkj{kkRed vuqla/kku dh vko';drk ugha gS] vr% izkFkhZ dks vfxze tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkosA
[2024:RJ-JP:38233]
[CRLMB-9498/2024]
(2 of 2)
blds foijhr ;ksX; vf/koDrk ifjoknh ,oa ;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd ds }kjk vfxze tekur vkosnu dk fojks/k fd;k rFkk rdZ fn;k fd ifjoknh ,oa vfHk;qDr ds e/; dksbZ Hkh jkthukek is'k ugha gqvk gSA jkthukek ds laca/k esa tks nLrkost is'k gqvk gS] oks izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ls iwoZ dk jgk gSA vuqla/kku ds nkSjku izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ekaxsjke ds fo:) Li"V rkSj ij vk{ksi vk, gSaA izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa vfHk;qDr dk uke vafdr gSA izdj.k esa vuqla/kku 'ks"k gSA vijk/k dh izd`fr xaHkhj gS] vr% izLrqr vfxze tekur vkosnu [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA
geus nksuksa i{kksa dh vksj ls izLrqr rdksZa] fordksZa ij euu fd;kA dslMk;jh] rF;kRed fjiksVZ dk voyksdu fd;kA ;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZ }kjk ftl jkthukek ds laca/k esa /;ku vkdf"kZr djk;k gS] og jkthukek ifjoknh ,oa izkFkhZ ds e/; ugha jgk gS] ftl dkj.k jkthukek dk dksbZ fof/kd ewY; ugha gSA dslMk;jh ,oa rF;kRed fjiksVZ ij miyC/k lk{; ls ;g izdV ugha gksrk fd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dks bl izdj.k esa fdlh izdkj ls feF;k vkfyIr fd;k tk jgk gks] u gh ,slh dksbZ vkiokfnd ifjfLFkfr;ka i=koyh ij fo+|eku gSa] ftlds vk/kkj ij izkFkhZ dks vfxze tekur dk ykHk fn;k tk ldrk gksA vr% nksuksa i{kksa ds vf/koDrkx.k }kjk j[ks x, rdkaZs] izdj.k ds rF;ksa ,oa leLr ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g vfxze tekur vkosnu Lohdkj fd;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr izrhr ugha gksrk gSA
ifj.kker% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ekaxsjke iq= Jh vtqZu jke dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g vfxze tekur vkosnu varxZr /kkjk 482 Hkkjrh; U;k; lafgrk vLohdkj dj [kkfjt fd;k tkrk gSA
(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J
MANOJ ADWANI /307
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the applicant in FIR No. 80/2024 under Sections 420, 406 and 120B IPC.
4 provisions across 2 enactments
Mangeram s/o Arjunram
State of Rajasthan, Through PP
Vinod Kumar Bharwani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
