Allowed

Manglaram v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC29 Jul 2024CRLMB/9307/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Jodhpur allowed a bail application filed under Section 483 BNSS by an accused arrested in a Schedule 27/28 NDPS case. The court noted the co-accused was already on bail and the contraband involved was below commercial quantity, granting bail.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail by furnishing a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- and two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each.

Manglaram Vs State of Rajasthan — Narcotics (NDPS) | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9307/2024

¶3

Manglaram S/o Purbaram, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Narva Kalan, Police Station Khinvsar, Dist. Nagaur. (Presently Lodged At Dist. Jail, Nagaur)

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Niwas Bishnoi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mahipal Vishnoi, PP

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR

¶10

Order

¶11

29/07/2024

¶12

This application for bail under Section 483 BNSS has been filed by the petitioner who has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 67/2024 registered at Police Station Panchodi, District Nagour for offences under Sections 8/18 and 8/29 of the NDPS Act.

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the Coaccused Suresh (S.B. Cr. Bail Application No. 6420/2024) has already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 23.5.2024. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the contraband recovered from the petitioner is below commercial quantity. Learned counsel submitted that the petitioner is in

¶15

[CRLMB-9307/2024]

¶16

(2 of 2)

¶17

judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficiently long time, therefore, the benefit of bail may be granted to the accusedpetitioner.

¶18

Per contra , learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶19

Having considered the rival submissions, facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶20

Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner Manglaram S/o Shri Purbaram arrested in connection with FIR No.67/2024 registered at Police Station Panchodi, District Nagour shall be released on bail, if not wanted in any other case, provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- and two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each, to the satisfaction of learned trial court, for his appearance before that court on each & every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till completion of the trial.

¶21

(KULDEEP MATHUR),J

¶22

ns. 1-/-

Manglaram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manglaram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhanwaralal Bugalia Vs Shankarlal

Rakesh Mehandiratta (Arroa) Vs State of Rajasthan

The New Indian Insurance Company Limited Vs Vidhya

Prithvi Singh @ Prithvi Raj Vs State of Rajasthan

Gautam Vs State of Rajasthan

Hanuman Prasad Vs State of Rajasthan