In this bail application, the petitioner's counsel stated the application had become infructuous. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the application based on this representation without summoning the parties or hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:8361]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8946/2023
Bhupendra Rankawat @ Bhanu S/o Sh. Surendra, Aged About 40 Years, B/c Vaishnav, R/o 6, Amrit Vihar Nagar, P.s. Chb, Jodhpur (Presently Lodged In Central Jail, Jodhpur).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ramprakash Dudi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mohd. Javed Gauri, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order
16/02/2024
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that this criminal misc. bail application has been rendered infructuous.
In view of the statement of learned counsel for the petitioner, this civil miscellaneous application is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J
42-mohit/-
Bhupendra Rankawat @ Bhanu
State Of Rajasthan
PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
