The High Court of Rajasthan dismissed bail application of Pawan @ Pankhya, facing Section 382, 420, 406, and 427 IPC charges. The court noted 11 other pending cases, a low bond value of Rs. 2500, and prior breach of conditions, aligning with DSC self Drive Cars principles where bail warrants continued criminal activity.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:39719]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8647/2024
Pawan @ Pankhya S/o Suresh, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Nangal Panditpura, Police Station Kotputli, District Kotputli Behror, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Kotputli)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. S S Ola For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA
Order
19/09/2024
izkFkhZ dh vksj ls /kkjk 483 Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk ds izko/kkuksa ds vUrxZr iqfyl Fkkuk dksViwryh] ftyk dksViwryh&cgjksM+ esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 382@2024 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 420] 406] 427 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk esa tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus gsrq ;g izkFkZuki= is”k fd;k x;k gSA
cgl lquh xbZA fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ dks izdj.k esa feF;k lafyIr fd;k x;k gSA mlus okgu 2500 :i;s ,d fnu gsrq fdjk;s ij fy;k Fkk vkSj ckn esa okgu ykSVk fn;k rFkk fdjk;k Hkh ns fn;kA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr fnukad 25-06-2024 ls vfHkj{kk esa gSA izdj.k eftLVªsV U;k;ky; }kjk fopkj.kh; gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds fo:) iwoZ ds tks 11 ekeys lafLFkr gksuk crk;s x;s gSa] muesa ls 05 ekeys ,d gh Fkkus ij o"kZ 2022 esa cuk;s x;s gSA izdj.k esa vkjksii= izLrqr gks pqdk gS rFkk vUoh{kk esa le; yxsxkA vr% izkFkhZ dks tekur dk ykHk iznku fd;k tkosA
blds foijhr ;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr us okgu dks fdjk;s ij ys tkdj mlds Vk;j o vU; lkeku cny fn;s vkSj bl
[2024:RJ-JP:39719]
[CRLMB-8647/2024]
(2 of 2)
izdkj vkijkf/kd U;klHkax dk vijk/k dkfjr fd;kA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds fo:) iwoZ ds 11 vU; vkijkf/kd izdj.k ntZ gSa] tks fofHkUu izd`fr ds gSaA izkFkhZ vknru vijk/kh gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds fo:) xEHkhj vijk/kksa dk vfHk;ksx gSA vr% vijk/k dh xEHkhjrk dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, tekur izkFkZuki= fujLr fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA
izLrqr rdksZa ij euu fd;kA dsl Mk;jh dk /;kuiwoZd voyksdu fd;k x;kA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ij /kkjk 420] 406] 427 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk ds vijk/kksa dk vfHk;ksx gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ij DSC self Drive Cars dEiuh ls 2]500 :i;s esa ,d fnu ds fy, fdjk;s ij fLoQ~V fMtk;j dkj la[;k vkjts45 lhMCY;w 5685 dks QthZ uke ¼ys[kjkt½ ls dwVjfpr vk/kkj dkMZ izLrqr djrs gq, ys tkus o mls okfil ugha ykSVkus vkSj mlds pkjksa Vk;j] ykWd vkfn cnyus rFkk LVsiuh xk;c djus ds vijk/k dk vk{ksi gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds fo:) iwoZ ds 11 vU; vkijkf/kd izdj.k Hkh lafLFkr gSa] tks o"kZ 2020 ls fujUrj ntZ gq, gSaA mDr izdj.k ekjihV] pksjh] gR;k ds iz;kl] vk;q/k vf/kfu;e o vuqlwfpr tkfr@tutkfr ¼vR;kpkj fuokj.k½ vf/kfu;e rFkk rhu izdj.k blh izdfr ds xEHkhj vijk/kksa ls lacaf/kr gSaA ,slh fLFkfr esa ;g izdV gksrk gS fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr }kjk mls mDr izdj.kksa esa izkIr tekur dh lqfo/kk dk nq:i;ksx djrs gq, ckj&ckj vijk/k dkfjr fd;s x;s gSaA bl izdkj izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr vknru vkijkf/kd izofRr dk O;fDr gksuk izdV gksrk gSA mi;qZDr leLr rF;ksa&ifjfLFkfr;ksa o vfHk;qDr ds vkpj.k dks /;ku eas j[krs gq, izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr izrhr ugha gksrk gSA
ifj.kkeLo:i izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls /kkjk 483 Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk ds izko/kkuksa ds vUrxZr izLrqr ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= fujLr fd;k tkrk gSA
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J
VISHAL SHARMA /76
3 issues framed by the court
Whether bail under Section 483 CrPC should be granted when the accused hasraised similar charges in 11 other pending cases and previous bail is on a bond of Rs. 2500.
Whether the petitioner's release would encourage continuing criminal behaviour given multiple case reservations.
Whether the Special Police Report registration mandates a bail order in bail applications.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
DSC self Drive CarsExplained¶19
DSC self Drive Cars v. State of Rajasthan
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Pawan @ Pankhya S/o Suresh
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
Shubha Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
