Allowed

Kishan Lal Dhakad v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC14 Mar 2024CRLMB/843/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application under Section 439 CrPC for an accused in an NDPS case (Sections 8/29) based on FIR No. 196/2023. No criminal history and no call detail evidence linking him to co-accused Radheshyam; trial would take time, so the court granted bail subject to furnishing surety.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted on personal bond of Rs. 1 lakh and two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each, subject to regular attendance before the trial court.

Kishan Lal Dhakad Vs State of Rajasthan — Narcotics (NDPS) | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JD:12177]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 843/2024

¶4

Kishan Lal S/o Shri Heera Lal, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Kharadi, Begu, Tehisi Begu, Dist Chittorgarh. (Lodged In Sub Jail, Beggu)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr.	NK Gurjar
For Respondent(s)	: Mr.	Javed Gouri,PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT

¶11

Order

¶12

14/03/2024

¶13

01izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls tekur dk ;g vkosnu vUrxZr /kkjk 439 n.M izfØ;k lafgrk iqfyl Fkkuk csxwa ftyk fpRrkSM+x<+ esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 196@2023] vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 8@29 ,u-Mh-ih-,l- vf/kfu;e ds ekeys esa izLrqr gqvk gSA

¶14

02geus cgl tekur vkosnu lquh rFkk miyC/k vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;kA

¶15

03fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk rdZ gS fd bl ekeys esa lg&vfHk;qDr jk/ks”;ke ls cjkenxh gqbZ gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks ekeys esa bl vk/kkj ij lafyIr fd;k x;k gS fd lg&vfHk;qDr jk/ks”;ke }kjk /kkjk 27 lk{; vf/kfu;e ds rgr nh xbZ lwpuk esa crk;k fd og eky izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ls ysdj vk;k Fkk tcfd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh dksbZ dkWy fMVsy jk/ks”;ke ds lkFk ckrphr gksus dh ugha ikbZ xbZ gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks >wBk Qalk;k x;k gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds fo:) ,uMhih,l vf/kfu;e ds rgr iwoZ esa dksbZ izdj.k ntZ ugha gSA fopkj.k esa le; yxus dh lEHkkouk gSA bu vk/kkjksa ij izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks tekur ij fjgk fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dhA

¶16

04blds foijhr ;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd us tekur vkosnu dk fojks/k fd;kA

[2024:RJ-JD:12177]

[CRLMB-843/2024]

(2 of 2)

05tekur vkosnu ij euu fd;k] i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;kA vkjksi i= izLrqr fd;k tk pqdk gSA izdj.k esa dksbZ cjkenxh ugha gqbZ gS u gh lg&vfHk;qDr jk/ks”;ke ftlls dh cjkenxh gqbZ gS] ls ckrphr djus dh dksbZ dkWy fMVsy izkIr gqbZ gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds fo:) iwoZ esa ,uMhih,l vf/kfu;e ds rgr vU; dksbZ izdj.k ntZ ugha gSA fopkj.k esa le; yxus dh lEHkkouk ls budkj ugha fd;k tk ldrkA

¶21

06cgl esa mBk;s x;s fcUnqvksa ,oa vfHkys[k ij miyC/k lkexzh dks /;ku esa j[krs gq,] bl ekeys esa /kkjk 37 ,uMhih,l vf/kfu;e dh viokfnr ifjfLFkfr;ka fo| eku gS ftudks en~nsutj j[krs gq, izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk tqeZ dh izd`fr o ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks bl U;k;ky; dh jk; esa tekur ij fjgk fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶22

07ifj.kker% tekur vkosnu vUrxZr /kkjk 439 n.M izfØ;k lafgrk Lohdkj fd;k tkdj vkns”k fn;k tkrk gS fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr fd”kuyky iq= ghjkyky mi;qZDr izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ds ekeys esa v/khuLFk U;k;ky; esa viuh fu;fer mifLFkfr ds laca/k esa ,d yk[k :i;s dk eqpydk ,oa ;ksX; v/khuLFk U;k;ky; ds larks’kizn ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks tekur izLrqr dj rLnhd djk ns rks mls bl izdj.k esa tekur ij rqjar fjgk dj fn;k tkosA

¶23

(YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT),J

¶24

556-SN LOHRA/-

Kishan Lal Dhakad v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kishan Lal Dhakad v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hemlata Kankariya Vs State of Rajasthan

Kalupuri Vs State of Rajasthan

Keshav @ Kachru Vs State of Rajasthan

Jagdish Vs State of Rajasthan

Jeevan Vs State of Rajasthan

Amar Singh Vs State of Rajasthan