Bail application rejected due to the gravity of allegations under Sections 8/29 CrPC involving injury to 5-20 persons, prior criminal history, and the petitioner being a habitual offender. The court held that without appreciating the merits and circumstances, admission of bail was not proper.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:44010]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8351/2024
Rajesh Meena @ Raj @tikam S/o Pappu Ram, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Nayagaon, Police Station Piloda, District Gangapur City. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohit Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakad, PP
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA
Order
21/10/2024
izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls /kkjk 483 Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk&2023 ds izko/kkuksa ds vUrxZr iqfyl Fkkuk izrki uxj] t;iqj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 433@2024 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 8] 21 ,u-Mh-ih-,l- ,DV esa tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus gsrq ;g izkFkZuki= is”k fd;k x;k gSA
cgl lquh xbZA fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ dks izdj.k esa feF;k lafyIr fd;k x;k gSA mudk rdZ gS fd izdj.k 5-20 xzke gsjksbZu dk gS] tks lg vfHk;qDr ls cjken gqbZ gSA mlds vkf/kiR; ls dksbZ cjkenxh ugha gqbZ gSA izdj.k esa vkjksi i= izLrqr gks pqdk gSA og fnukad 14-6-2024 ls vfHkj{kk esa gSA mudk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ ds fo:) iwoZ ds tks izdj.k ,uMhih,l ,DV ds crk;s x;s gSa] mlesa ls ,d izdj.k 492@2024 esa cjken'kqnk eknd inkFkZ dh ek=k okf.kfT;d ek=k ls de Fkh] ftlesa vfHkj{kk ds nkSjku mls bl izdj.k lfgr izdj.k la[;k 486@2024 esa ,uMhih,l ,DV ds vijk/k dk vfHk;qDr cuk;k x;k gSA mudk rdZ gS fd iwoZ ds nksuksa izdj.kks a esa og tekur ij eqDr gks pqdk gSA izkFkhZ
[2024:RJ-JP:44010]
[CRLMB-8351/2024]
(2 of 2)
fnukad 14-6-2024 ls fujUrj vfHkj{kk esa gSA vkjksi i= izLrqr gks pqdk gSA vUoh{kk esa le; yxsxkA vr% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks tekur ij eqDr fd;k tk;sA
blds foijhr ;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo:) /kkjk 8@29 ,u-Mh-ih-,l- ,DV ds vijk/k dk vfHk;ksx gSA izdj.k 5-20 xzke gsjksbZu dh cjkenxh dk gSA mlds fo:) iwoZ ds nks izdj.k ,uMhih,l ,DV ls lEcfU/kr rFkk nks vU; /kkjk 379 Hkknala o 323] 342] 365] 382] 327] 34 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk ds Hkh ntZ gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ,d vknru vijk/kh gSA vr% tekur izkFkZuki= fujLr fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA
izLrqr rdksZa ij euu fd;kA dsl Mk;jh dk /;kuiwoZd voyksdu fd;k x;kA izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo:) /kkjk 8@29 ,u-Mh-ih-,l- ,DV ds vijk/k dk vfHk;ksx gSA izdj.k esa 5-20 xzke gsjksbZu dh cjkenxh gqbZ gSA mlds fo:) iwoZ ds nks izdj.k ,uMhih,l ,DV ls lEcfU/kr rFkk nks vU; /kkjk 379 Hkknala o 323] 342] 365] 382] 327] 34 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk ds Hkh ntZ gSA ,slk izrhr gks jgk gS fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr fujUrj ,u-Mh-ih-,l- ,DV ds vijk/k esa fyIr jgk gSA vr% mi;qZDr leLr rF;kas ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, rFkk izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds vkijkf/kd fjdkMZ dks ns[krs gq, bl izdze ij ekeys ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd, fcuk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkuk mfpr ugha gSA
ifj.kkeLo:i izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= fujLr fd;k tkrk gSA
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J
JITENDRA SINGH PANWAR /9
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the bail petition of the petitioner should be admitted or dismissed?
4 provisions across 1 enactments
Rajesh Meena @ Raj @tikam S/o Pappu Ram
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
Shubha Mehta
Jitendra Singh Panwar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
