Bail application dismissed. Court held that petitioner's repeated dishonouring of cheques leading to conviction precludes grant of bail under Section 483 of the Evidence Act.
Application under Section 483 of the Evidence Act dismissed; antecedent betrayers prevent grant of bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:33838]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8141/2024
Sandeep Kumar Das S/o Shakti Mehra, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Bardehi, Police Station Pathardda, District Deoghar, Jharkhand. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Bharatpur).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mritunjya Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sanjeev Mahala, PP
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA
Order
08/08/2024
izdj.k esa la'kksf/kr 'kh"kZd izLrqr fd;k tk pqdk gS] ftls vfHkys[k ij fy;k tkrk gSA
izkFkhZ dh vksj ls /kkjk 483 Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk ds izko/kkuksa ds vUrxZr lkbZcj iqfyl Fkkuk] Hkjriqj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 38@2023 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 420 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk o /kkjk 66Mh lwpuk izkS|ksfxdh vf/kfu;e 2000 esa tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus gsrq ;g izkFkZuki= is”k fd;k x;k gSA
cgl lquh xbZA fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ dks izdj.k esa feF;k lafyIr fd;k x;k gSA izkFkhZ ds fo:) /kkjk 420 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk o /kkjk 66Mh lwpuk izkS|ksfxdh vf/kfu;e 2000 ds vijk/kksa dk vfHk;ksx gS] tks eftLVªsV }kjk fopkj.kh; gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr fnukad 23-05-2024 ls vfHkj{kk esa gSA izdj.k esa vUos"k.k iw.kZ gksdj vkjksii= izLrqr gks pqdk gSA izdj.k dh vUoh{kk esa le; yxsxkA vr% izkFkhZ dks tekur dk ykHk iznku fd;k tkosA
blds foijhr ;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ij ;g vk{ksi gS fd mlus ifjoknh dks eksckbZy ij dkWy dj mls osjhfQds'ku dksM Hkstk
[2024:RJ-JP:33838]
[CRLMB-8141/2024]
(2 of 2)
rFkk ifjoknh ds [kkrs ls fofHkUu le; esa dqy 42]500 :i;s fudkydj mlds lkFk Bxh dh gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds fo:) iwoZ ds blh izd`fr ds 02 vU; ekeys lafLFkr gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds fo:) xEHkhj vijk/kksa dk vfHk;ksx gSA vr% vijk/k dh xEHkhjrk dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, tekur izkFkZuki= fujLr fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA
izLrqr rdksZa ij euu fd;kA dsl Mk;jh dk /;kuiwoZd voyksdu fd;k x;kA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ij ;g vk{ksi gS fd mlus ifjoknh ds eksckbZy ij dkWy dj isVh,e lkm.M ckWDl fjis;fjax laca/kh ckr dj osjhfQds'ku dksM Hkstk rFkk pkj ckj esa dqy 42]500 :i;s ifjoknh ds [kkrs ls fudky fy;sA bl izdkj izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr us rduhdh Kku izkIr djds lksps&le>s <ax ls ifjoknh ds lkFk /kks[kk/kM+h dj mlds [kkrs ls :i;s fudkys gSaA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ij iwoZ ds nks vkijkf/kd izdj.k lafLFkr gSa] tks nksuksa gh blh izdfr ds gSaA bl izdkj izkFkhZ }kjk mls tekur ij eqDr fd;s tkus ds i'pkr~ ckj&ckj blh izdkj ds vijk/k dkfjr djrs gq, tekur dh lqfo/kk dk nq:i;ksx fd;k x;k gS] ftlls izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr vkijkf/kd izofRr dk O;fDr gksuk izrhr gksrk gSA orZeku~ esa bl izdkj dh vkWuykbZu Bxh ds ekeyksa esa mRrjksRrj of) gks jgh gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds iwoZ vkpj.k dks ns[krs gq, mls tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus ls mlds }kjk iqu% vijk/k dh iqujkofRr fd;s tkus dh lEHkkouk ls budkj ugha fd;k tk ldrk gSA mi;qZDr leLr rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa rFkk vfHk;qDr ds iwoZ vkpj.k o vijk/k dh izd`fr dks /;ku eas j[krs gq, izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr izrhr ugha gksrk gSA
ifj.kkeLo:i izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls /kkjk 483 Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk ds izko/kkuksa ds vUrxZr izLrqr ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= fujLr fd;k tkrk gSA
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J
VISHAL SHARMA /30
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the bail application under Section 483 of the Evidence Act should be allowed given the previous convictions under Section 138 NI Act and Section 171 I.P.C.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Sandeep Kumar Das
State Of Rajasthan
Shubha Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
