Allowed

Hanuman Ram v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC6 May 2024CRLMB/814/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Two bail applications for accused in an NDPS case arising from FIR 41/2023 at Pindwara police station were heard together. No cold detail was found with the co-accused, no prior NDPS record existed against Manish, and no evidence linked Hanuman Ram to the vehicle's location during the offence. Bail was granted on personal bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Both petitioners released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 each and two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each.

Hanuman Ram Vs State of Rajasthan — Narcotics (NDPS) | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JD:19847]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2821/2024

¶4

Manish @ Laduram S/o Shri Vijay Singh, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Digaon Mali, Police Staiton Afjalpur, Dist. Mandsor (Mp) (Lodged In Jail Pindwara)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

Connected With

¶10

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 814/2024 Hanuman Ram S/o Babu Lal, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Ramedawas Kallan, Ps Kaparda Dist. Jodhpur. (Lodged In Sub Jail, Aburoad).

¶11

----Petitioner

¶12

Versus

¶13

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶14

----Respondent

¶15

For Petitioner(s)	:	Mr. Kisan Lal Vishnoi Mr. Kailash Khilery
For Respondent(s)	:	Mr. Javed Gouri, PP
		Ms. Maya Pandit, SIP, Ps. Abu Road, CitySirohi

¶16

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT

¶17

Order

¶18

06/05/2024

¶19

01izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls nks vyx&vyx tekur vkosnu i= vUrxZr /kkjk 439 n.M izfØ;k lafgrk] ds ,d gh izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k%&41@2023] iqfyl Fkkuk fi.MokMk] ftyk fljksgh] vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 8@15] 29 ,u-Mh-ih-,l ,DV ls lacaf/kr gksus ls mudk ,d lkFk fuLrkj.k fd;k tk jgk gSA

¶20

02cgl tekur vkosnu lquh rFkk miyC/k vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;kA

[2024:RJ-JD:19847]

[CRLMB-2821/2024]

(2 of 3)

03izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr euh"k mQZ yknwjke ds ;ksX; vf/koDrk dh vksj ls ;g rdZ izLrqr fd;k gS fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks bl izdj.k esa >wBk Qalk;k x;k gSA bl ekeys esa lgvfHk;qDr egsUnz }kjk nh xbZ bZRryk fd eky izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr euh"k mQZ yknwjke dks nsuk Fkk] bl vk/kkj ij bl ekeys esa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks lafyIr fd;k x;k gSA dksbZ dkWy fMVsy izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh lgvfHk;qDr egsUnz ds lkFk dh ugha gSA bl vk/kkj ij izFke n`"V;k gh ekeyk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds fo:) cuuk ugha ik;k tkrk gSA iwoZ esa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds fo:) dksbZ ,u-Mh-ih-,l- ,DV dk izdj.k ntZ ugha gSA bl vk/kkj ij /kkjk 37 ,u-Mh-ih-,l- ,DV dh viokfnr ifjfLFkfr;ka ekStwn gksuk crkrs gq, izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk fn, tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶25

04izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr guqekujke ds ;ksX; vf/koDrk dh vksj ls ;g rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd bl ekeys esa dsoy ek= lgvfHk;qDr egsUnz }kjk nh xbZ bZRryk ij izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks vijk/k esa lafyIr fd;k x;k gSA bl ekeys esa lgvfHk;qDr egsUnz ds lkFk dksbZ dkWy fMVsy ugha gSA bl ekeys esa cjkenxh ds le; dksbZ O;fDr okgu lhV ij ugha FkkA okgu ij yxs QkWLVªsd ds vk/kkj ij egsUnz xksnkjk dks bl ekeys esa lafyIr fd;k x;k gS vkSj egsUnz dqekj xksnkjk ds crkus ds vk/kkj ij izkFkh Z &vfHk;qDr dks bl ekeys esa vijk/k esa lafyIr fd;k x;k gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds fo:) ,d izdj.k ,u-Mh-ih-,l- ,DV dk ntZ gksuk crk;kA ftlesa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh tekur gks pqdh gSA bl vk/kkj ij /kkjk 37 ,u-Mh-ih-,l- ,DV dh viokfnr ifjfLFkfr;ka ekStwn gksuk crkrs gq, izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk fn, tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶26

05blds foijhr ;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd o bl ekeys ds vuqla/kku vf/kdkjh us mifLFkr gksdj mDr tekur vkosnu i= dk l[r fojks/k djrs gq, ;g Lohdkj fd;k fd nksuksa izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dh lgvfHk;qDr egsUnz dqekj ds lkFk dksbZ ckrphr ckcr dkWy fMVsy ugha gSA ijarq ;g crk;k fd egsUnz us guqekujke dk Lo;a ds lkFk gksuk crk;k Fkk] bl vk/kkj ij guqekujke dks bl ekeys esa lafyIr fd;k x;k gS vkSj izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr euh"k mQZ yknwjke dks eky ys tkdj nsuk Fkk] bl vk/kkj ij izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr euh"k dks bl vijk/k esa lafyIr fd;k x;k gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr guqekujke dks izksMD'ku okj.V ls tsy ls ryc djokdj fxjQ~rkj fd;k tkuk crk;k x;k gSA bl vk/kkj ij izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dk tekur izkFkZuk&i= [kkfjt fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶27

06eSaus mi;qZDr rdkZsa ij euu fd;k rFkk dsl Mk;jh dk voyksdu fd;kA bl ekeys esa eq[; vfHk;qDr egsUnz dks Hkh QkWLVªsd ds vk/kkj ij vijk/k esa lafyIr

[2024:RJ-JD:19847]

[CRLMB-2821/2024]

(3 of 3)

fd;k x;k gSA ekSds ij cjkenxh ds le; okgu esa dksbZ O;fDr gksuk ugha crk;k x;k gS vkSj izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dh dksbZ dkWy fMVsy egsUnz dqekj ds lkFk gksuk vuqla/kku esa ugha ik;k x;k gS vkSj okgu ftl LFkku ls cjken gqvk] ml LFkku ij guqekujke dh dksbZ yksds'ku gksuk bl ekeys esa lk{; ij ugha gS vkSj izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr euh"k dks eky ys tkdj nsuk lgvfHk;qDr }kjk crk;k x;kA bl vk/kkj ij izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr euh"k dks vijk/k esa lafyIr fd;k gSA ,slh voLFkk esa ;g fo'okl djus ds fy, mfpr vk/kkj gS fd izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k bl rjg ds vijk/k ds nks"kh ugha gS vkSj tekur ij jgrs gq, muds }kjk dksbZ vijk/k djus dh laHkkouk ugha gSA

¶32

07cgl esa mBk;s x;s fcUnqvksa ,oa vfHkys[k ij miyC/k lkexzh dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk] izdj.k ds rF;ksa o ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks ns[krs gq, /kkjk 37 ,u-Mh-ih-,l- ,DV dh viokfnr ifjLFkfr;ka gksus ls izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr izrhr gksrk gSA izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶33

08ifj.kker% izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dk tekur vkosnu i= Lohdkj fd;k tkdj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k euh"k mQZ yknwjke iq= fo;tflag o guqekujke iq= ckcwjke iqfyl Fkkuk fi.MokMk] ftyk fljksgh+ esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 41@2023 ds ekeys esa viuh fu;fer mifLFkfr ds laca/k esa izR;sd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ,d yk[k :i;s dk eqpydk ,oa ;ksX; v/khuLFk U;k;ky; ds larks’kizn ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks tekur izLrqr dj rLnhd djk ns rks mUgsa bl izdj.k esa tekur ij rqjar fjgk dj fn;k tkosA

¶34

(YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT),J

¶35

11-12-mayank/-

Hanuman Ram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hanuman Ram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rahul Katakwar Vs Sonam

Kamal Singh Nehara Vs State of Rajasthan

Prakash Chandra Joshi Vs State of Rajasthan

Manish @ Laduram Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramlal Vs State of Rajasthan

Smt. Raju Devi Vs State and Ors.