Bench dismissed the second bail application filed by the petitioner involved in a narcotics case. The court held that the recovery of a huge quantity (175 Kg) of opium and the petitioner's status as an habitual offender made it an unfit case for bail.
Second bail application dismissed; petitioner ordered to remain in custody.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 781/2024
Chetan @ Vinod S/o Shri Shoykaran, R/o Village Khunidya, Police Station Khandrela, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) (Earlier Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur At Present Confined In Central Jail Shyalavas, District Dausa).
----Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anshuman Saxena, Adv. Mr. Heera Lal Prajapati, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ganesh Saini, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA Order
13/02/2024
[CRLMB-781/2024]
(2 of 2)
counsel for the petitioner further submits that out of 28 witnesses, statements of only 7 witnesses have been recorded by the trial court. Conclusion of trial may take long time. So, the petitioner be enlarged on bail.
(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J
Gourav/08
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be enlarged on bail in a second bail application regarding NDPS offences.
Whether the huge quantity of opium recovered and pending charges prevent bail.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Chetan @ Vinod
The State Of Rajasthan
Narendra Singh Dhaddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
