Single-judge Rajasthan High Court bench granted bail to Rajeev Kaushik in a cheating case. The court noted investigation was complete and prima facie evidence existed, releasing him on personal bond without bail bond.
Bail granted on personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 and two sureties of Rs. 1,00,000 each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:33636]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal 2nd Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7763/2024
Rajeev Kaushik S/o Shri Nartwarlal, R/o 5/132, S.f.s., Agrawal Farm, Sector 5, Mansarovar, Jaipur, Presently Residing B-2/409, Chitrakoot, Jaipur, (Presently Confined In Central Jail At Jaipur).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Anupam Sharma, Adv. |
|---|---|
| For | : Mr. Laxman Meena, PP |
| Respondent(s) | Mr. Vipul Jaiman, Adv. |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS
Judgment / Order
07/08/2024
izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls viuh fu;fer tekur gsrq ;g f}rh; tekur izkFkZuk i= n.M izfdz;k lafgrk dh /kkjk 439 ds vUrxZr iqfyl Fkkuk &dj.kh fogkj] t;iqj if'pe esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k &422@2023 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 420] 467] 468] 471] 120ch Hkk-na-la- esa is'k fd;k x;k gSA
fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr us rdZ fn;k fd vfHk;qDr funksZ"k gS] vuqla/kku dh LVst ij izFke tekur vkosnu [kkfjt fd;k x;k FkkA ;g fuosnu fd;k fd vfHk;qDr ds laca/k esa vuqla/kku iw.kZ gks pqdk gS] og fnukad 01-10-2023 ls
[CRLMB-7763/2024]
[2024:RJ-JP:33636]
(2 of 3)
vfHkj{kk esa gS] fopkj.k esa le; yxsxk] blfy, izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA
fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd rFkk vf/koDrk ifjoknh dk fuosnu gS fd ekeyk xaHkhj gS] ikap djksM :i;s ds IykWV dks gMius gsrq ;g vijk/k dkfjr fd;k gS] vUr esa vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk dks ns[krs gq, ;g tekur vkosnu [kkfjt fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dhA
nksuksa i{kksa dh cgl ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k ij miyC/k lkexzh dk voyksdu fd;kA
orZeku ekeys esa ;g vkjksi gS fd vfHk;qDr ds firk ds vU; okfjl gksus ds ckotwn ,dykSrk okfjl gksuk crkdj xyr 'kiFk i= izLrqr dj t;iqj fodkl izkf/kdj.k ds deZpkfj;ksa ds lkFk feydj nLrkostksa dh dwVjpuk dj IykWV gMius dk iz;kl fd;kA iwoZ esa iqfyl dks fnukad 16-01-2024 dks cdk;k vuqla/kku iw.kZ djus dk funsZ'k fn;k x;k rFkk nks ekg i'pkr vfHk;qDr dks uohu tekur vkosnu is'k djus dh Lora=rk nh x;h FkhA vc vuqla/kku iw.kZ gks pqdk gSA
vr% izdj.k ds rF;ksa] ifjfLFkfr;ksa] izLrqr rdksaZ ,oa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vfHkj{kk vof/k dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, izdj.k ds xq.k&nks"kksa ij fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA
ifj.kker% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr jktho dkSf'kd iq= uVojyky dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g f}rh; tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj dj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd izkFkhZ bl ekeys esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn] muds U;k;ky; ;k varfjrh U;k;ky; esa
(3 of 3)
[2024:RJ-JP:33636] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-7763/2024]
fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mls cqyk;k tk,] mifLFkfr gsrq ,d yk[k :i;s dk cU/k&i= rFkk ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks lqn`< izfrHkwfr;ka izLrqr dj izekf.kr djkos rks gLrxr izdj.k esa mls tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tk,A
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
Mittal /43
3 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the accused in Section 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC trial considering the delay in disposal.
Whether the delay in investigation and framing of charges warrants discharge or bail.
Whether the case sufficiently connects circumstances to warrant dismissal of bail application.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Rajeev Kaushik
State of Rajasthan
Uma Shanker Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
