Regular bail application in an NDPS case involving alleged supply of commercial quantity Mephedrone by the petitioner to two co-accused. The court noted eight prior criminal cases against the petitioner and incomplete investigation, and declined bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:43652]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7231/2024
Umesh Tikkiwal S/o Late Shri Umravmal, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Tenant House No. 432, Tikkiwalo Ka Rasta, Kishanpole Bazar, Police Station Kotwali, District Jaipur (North) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amit Ratnawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.R.Dhakad, PP
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA
Order
18/10/2024
izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls /kkjk 439 n.M izfØ;k lafgrk ds vUrxZr viuh fu;fer tekur gsrq ;g izkFkZuk&i= iqfyl Fkkuk f'konkliqjk ftyk t;iqj flVh ¼nf{k.k½ esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 301@2024 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 8@18] 8@22 Lokid vkS"kf/k ,oa eu%izHkkoh inkFkZ vf/kfu;e esa tekur dk ykHk fn, tkus dh izkFkZuk ds lkFk is”k fd;k x;k gSA
cgl lquh xbZA izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk rdZ gS fd mls izdj.k esa feF;k lafyIr fd;k x;k gSA mudk rdZ gS fd vfHk;qDr ds ikl ls fdlh eknd inkFkZ dh dksbZ cjkenxh ugha gqbZ gSA mls dsoy lgvfHk;qDr ds dFku ds vk/kkj ij izdj.k esa vfHk;qDr ekuk x;k gSA mudk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd vfHk;qDr iou mQZ ccyw ftlds vkf/kiR; ls eknd inkFkZ cjken gksuk crk;k x;k gS] mlus Vksad ds fdlh eqfLye O;fDr ls mDr Mªx izkIr djuk crk;k gS] tks izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ugha gSA lkFk gh tks Mªx dh ek=k crk;h x;h gS og okf.kfT;d ek=k ls dqN gh feyhxzke vf/kd crk;h x;h gSA izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr fnukad 11-04-2024 ls vfHkj{kk esa gSaA mlds fo:) iwoZ dk bl izd`fr dk dksbZ vkSj eqdnek lafLFkr ugha gSA
[2024:RJ-JP:43652]
[CRLMB-7231/2024]
(2 of 2)
vkjksi&i= is'k gks pqdk gSA izdj.k ds fopkj.k esa le; yxsxkA vr% mls tekur ij eqDr fd;k tk,A
fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds tekur izkFkZuk&i= dk fojks/k djrs gq, rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd vfHk;qDr iou mQZ ccyw ls eknd inkFkZ ,eMh (Mephedrone) cjken gqvk gS tks 50-8 xzke gksdj okf.kfT;d ek=k esa gSA mDr eknd inkFkZ izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr }kjk mls miyC/k djok;k x;k gSA izkFkhZ@ vfHk;qDr ds fo:) iwoZ ds vkB fofHkUu izdkj ds vkijkf/kd izdj.k ntZ gSaA mls tekur ij eqDr ugha fd;k tk,A
nksuksa i{kksa ds rdksZa ij euu fd;k x;kA i=koyh dk /;kuiwoZd v/;;u
fd;k x;kA
i=koyh ds voyksdu ls izdV gksrk gS fd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo:) lgvfHk;qDrx.k iou mQZ ccyw ,oa f'ko'kadj dks eknd inkFkZ ,eMh miyC/k djkus dk /kkjk 8@29 Lokid vkS"kf/k ,oa eu%izHkkoh inkFkZ vf/kfu;e dk vfHk;ksx gSA izdj.k esa vc rd gq, vuqla/kku ls lgvfHk;qDrx.k iou mQZ ccyw ,oa f'ko'kadj ftuds vkf/kiR; ls Øe'k% 50-8 ,oa 50-2 xzke ,eMh cjken gksuk crk;k x;k gS] og izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds }kjk mUgsa miyC/k djokbZ xbZ gS tks dqy feykdj 101 xzke gksrh gSA bl izdkj izdj.k esa tCr'kqnk dqy eknd inkFkZ 101 xzke ,eMh okf.kfT;d ek=k esa gS] ftudks lgvfHk;qDrx.k iou mQZ ccyw ,oa f'ko'kadj }kjk izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ls Ø; fd;k x;k gSA izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo:) iwoZ ds Hkh vkB vkijkf/kd izdj.k ekjihV ,oa vU; vijk/kksa ls lEcfU/kr lafLFkr gksus dk rF; lkeus vk;k gSA izdj.k esa vHkh vuqla/kku iw.kZ ugha gqvk gSA vr% izdj.k ds rF;ksa ,oa ifjLFkfr;ksa rFkk tCr'kqnk eknd inkFkZ dh okf.kfT;d ek=k dks ns[krs gq, bl izØe ij ekeys ds xq.kkoxq.k ij fVIi.kh fd, fcuk izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr izrhr ugha gksrk gSA
ifj.kker% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr tekur dk ;g izkFkZuk&i= vLohdkj dj fujLr fd;k tkrk gSA
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J
AJAY KUMAR SINGHAL /12
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the accused petitioner, implicated in a commercial quantity Mephedrone case based on co-accused statements, deserves regular bail under Section 439 CrPC despite investigation being incomplete.
4 provisions across 2 enactments
Umesh Tikkiwal
State of Rajasthan
Shubha Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
