The Rajasthan High Court granted bail to two accused persons charged under Section 302, 420, 120-B IPC. The court held that the significant delay in investigation and arraignment justified bail forward of constitutional rights.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7093/2024
----Petitioners
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) For Respondent(s)
: Mr. Ankit Khandelwal : Mr. M.K. Sheoran, PP
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA Order
02/08/2024
izkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls /kkjk 439 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds izko/kkuksa ds vUrxZr iqfyl Fkkuk Mhx] ftyk Mhx esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 138@2024 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 420] 406] 120&ch Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk esa tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus gsrq ;g izkFkZuki= is”k fd;k gSA
cgl lquh xbZA fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZx.k dks izdj.k esa feF;k lafyIr fd;k x;k gSA mudk rdZ gS fd izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ dks i<us ls gh Li"V ugha gS fd izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k }kjk fdlh O;fDr ls Ny fd;k x;k gSA vuqla/kku ds nkSjku Hkh ,slh dksbZ lk{; ugha vkbZ gS fd izkFkhZx.k }kjk fdlh ds lkFk Ny dkfjr fd;k x;k gksA izkFkhZx.k ds cSad [kkrs esa Ny ls dksbZ :i;k izkIr gksuk Hkh izdV ugha gqvk gSA muls dsoy udn jkf'k cjken gqbZ gSA izdj.k esa vkjksi i= izLrqr gks pqdk gS] ftldh vUoh{kk esa le; yxsxkA izkFkhZx.k fnukad 17-5-2024 ls U;kf;d vfHkj{kk eas py jgs gSA muds fo:) iwoZ esa
[CRLMB-7093/2024]
(2 of 2)
dksbZ vkijkf/kd izdj.k ntZ ugha gSA izdj.k eftLVªsV U;k;ky; }kjk fopkj.kh; gSA vr% izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dks tekur dk ykHk iznku fd;k tkosA
blds foijhr ;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo:) /kkjk 420] 406] 120&ch Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk ds vijk/k dk vfHk;ksx gSA vfHk;qDrx.k ds vkf/kiR; ls vkWuykbZu Bxh ds ek/;e ls izkIr :i;s] fofHkUu uEcjksa ls iSls Myokus lEcfU/kr Ldsuj o iSlksa ds ysunsu lEcU/kh Ldzhu 'kkWV izkIr gq, gSaA mudk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd muds vkf/kiR; ls /kks[kk/kMh ls izkIr udn jkf'k Hkh cjken gqbZ gSA vr% vijk/k dh xEHkhjrk dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, tekur izkFkZuki= fujLr fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA
izLrqr rdksZa ij euu fd;kA dsl Mk;jh dk /;kuiwoZd voyksdu fd;k x;kA izdj.k dh izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa vafdr rF;ksa ls izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k }kjk fdlh O;fDr ls Ny fd;k tkuk nf'kZr ugha gks jgk gSA vuqla/kku ds nkSjku Hkh ,slh dksbZ lk{; ugha vkbZ gS fd izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k }kjk fdlh ds lkFk Ny dkfjr fd;k x;k gksA izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k ls dsoy udn jkf'k cjken gqbZ gSA izdj.k esa vkjksi i= izLrqr gks pqdk gS] ftldh vUoh{kk esa le; yxsxkA izkFkhZx.k fnukad 17-52024 ls U;kf;d vfHkj{kk eas py jgs gSA muds fo:) iwoZ esa dksbZ vkijkf/kd izdj.k ntZ ugha gSA izdj.k eftLVªsV U;k;ky; }kjk fopkj.kh; gSA vr% mi;qZDr rF;ksa dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, bl Lrj ij ekeys ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk] izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr tekur izkFkZuki= Lohdkj fd;k tkuk mfpr gSA
ifj.kker% izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gSa vkSj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izR;sd izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k bl ekeys esa ;ksX; fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn] muds U;k;ky; esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh cqyk;k tk,] mifLFkfr gsrq ,d yk[k :i;s dk cU/k&i= ,oa ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks izfrHkwfr;ka izLrqr dj rLnhd djok ns rFkk mudh fdlh vU; izdj.k esa vko';drk u gks] rks mUgsa tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tk;sA
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J
JITENDRA SINGH PANWAR /61
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay in arraignment and investigation entitles the accused to bail.
Whether the delay in investigation and copping of trial orders warrants bail.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Aslam S/o Mubin
Rijwan S/o Sharif
State Of Rajasthan
SHUBHA MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
