Vacation judge allowed bail to the petitioner under Section 439 CrPC. The court noted serious allegations but found that the maximum punishment was less rigorous imprisonment, and an earlier related bail application had been granted while the current charges were admitted.
Petitioner released on bail; pending related bail application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:25315]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6815/2024
Monu S/o Sh Surendra Kumar, Aged About 22 Years, R/o House No 3 B Gali No 4 Prem Nagar Police Station Kotwali Sri Ganganagar.
(At Present Lodged In Central Jail Sri Ganganagar)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jitendra Ojha For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mukesh Trivedi, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT (VACATION JUDGE)
Order
04/06/2024
01izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls tekur dk ;g vkosnu vUrxZr /kkjk 439 n.M izfØ;k lafgrk iqfyl Fkkuk lnj xaxkuxj ftyk Jhxaxkuxj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 268@2024] vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 8@15] 8@18 ,uMhih,l vf/kfu;e ds ekeys esa izLrqr gqvk gSA
02geus cgl tekur vkosnu lquh rFkk miyC/k vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;kA
03fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks >wBk Qalk;k x;k gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ls tks eknd inkFkZ dh cjkenxh gksuk crkbZ xbZ gS mldh ek=k okf.kfT;d ek=k ls de gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds leku vkjksi okys lg&vfHk;qDr lksuw dqekj dh vksj ls izLrqr tekur vkosnu bl U;k;ky; }kjk fnukad 17-05-2024 dks Lohdkj fd;k tk pqdk gSA bl izdj.k ds vykok izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds fo:) vU; dksbZ izdj.k ,uMhih,l vf/kfu;e ds rgr ntZ ugha gSA fopkj.k esa le; yxus dh lEHkkouk gSA bu vk/kkjksa ij izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks tekur ij fjgk fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dhA
04blds foijhr ;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd us tekur vkosnu dk fojks/k fd;kA
[CRLMB-6815/2024]
[2024:RJ-JD:25315]
(2 of 2)
05tekur vkosnu ij euu fd;k] i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;kA cjkenlqnk eknd inkFkZ dh ek=k okf.kfT;d ek=k ls de gksuk crk;h xbZ gSA izkFkhZ ds leku vkjksi okys lg&vfHk;qDr lksuw dqekj dh vksj ls izLrqr tekur vkosnu la[;k 6075@2024 bl U;k;ky; }kjk fnukad 17-05-2024 dks Lohdkj fd;k tk pqdk gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds fo:) bl izdj.k ds vykok vU; dksbZ izdj.k ,uMhih,l vf/kfu;e ds rgr ntZ ugha gksuk crk;k x;k gSA fopkj.k esa le; yxus dh lEHkkouk ls budkj ugha fd;k tk ldrkA
06cgl esa mBk;s x;s fcUnqvksa ,oa vfHkys[k ij miyC/k lkexzh dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk tqeZ dh izd`fr o ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks bl U;k;ky; dh jk; esa tekur ij fjgk fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA
07ifj.kker% tekur vkosnu vUrxZr /kkjk 439 n.M izfØ;k lafgrk Lohdkj fd;k tkdj vkns”k fn;k tkrk gS fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr eksuw iq= lqjsUnz dqekj mi;qZDr izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ds ekeys esa v/khuLFk U;k;ky; esa viuh fu;fer mifLFkfr ds laca/k esa ,d yk[k :i;s dk eqpydk ,oa ;ksX; v/khuLFk U;k;ky; ds larks’kizn ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks tekur izLrqr dj rLnhd djk ns rks mls bl izdj.k esa tekur ij rqjar fjgk dj fn;k tkosA
(YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT (VACATION JUDGE)),J
7-SN LOHRA/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner pursuant to Section 439 CrPC in light of serious allegations made against him.
Whether the bail application is maintainable and if a subsequent application related to the same case has been disposed of.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Monu S/o Sh Surendra Kumar
State Of Rajasthan
YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
