Allowed

Bhomaram v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC29 May 2024CRLMB/6762/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan, Jodhpur allowed the bail application of an accused faced with a narcotics charge under Sections 8/15 of the NDPS Act. The court relied on the argument that the contraband was not of commercial quantity, allowing bail subject to a personal bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- and two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each.

Bhomaram Vs State of Rajasthan — Narcotics (NDPS) | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JD:24655]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6762/2024

¶4

Bhomaram S/o Sh Pemaram, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Village Aleti, Police Station Dhorimana, Distt Barmer, Presently Residing At Village Agadawa, Police Station Chitalwana, Distt Sanchore. ( Presently Lodged In Distt Jail Sanchore)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ranjeet Singh Chouhan For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.S. Bhati, PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR

¶11

Order

¶12

29/05/2024

¶13

This application for bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner who has been arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.87/2024 registered at Police Station Chitalwana, Dist. Sanchore, for the offence under Sections 8/15 of the NDPS Act.

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the contraband recovered from the petitioner is below commercial quantity. Learned counsel submitted that no case of similar nature is pending against the present petitioner; the petitioner is in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficiently long time, therefore, the benefit of bail may be granted to the accusedpetitioner.

[2024:RJ-JD:24655]

[CRLMB-6762/2024]

(2 of 2)

Per contra , learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

¶20

Having considered the rival submissions, facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶21

Consequently, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner Bhomaram S/o Sh Pemaram arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.87/2024 registered at Police Station Chitalwana, Dist. Sanchore, shall be released on bail, if not wanted in any other case, provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- and two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each, to the satisfaction of learned trial court, for his appearance before that court on each & every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till completion of the trial.

¶22

(KULDEEP MATHUR),J

¶23

393-divya/-

Bhomaram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhomaram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pratap Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Raj Singh @ Raja Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Ganpat @ Ankush Vs State of Rajasthan

Rampal Vs State of Rajasthan

Vijendra Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Champalal Vs State of Rajasthan