Rajasthan High Court decided on a bail application under Article 226 and Section 438 CrPC. The court noted irregularities in the evidence but frequently relied on the statutory provisions and decided the matter.
Anticipatory bail granted to the petitioner under Section 438 CrPC.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:31117]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.
6683/2024
Prameshvar Lal S/o Shir Ramkaran, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Dhoodwa Meeta, Churu, District Churu, Raj.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS
Judgment / Order
24/07/2024
izkFkhZ dh vksj ls ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= varxZr /kkjk 438 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk izkFkhZ dks iqfyl Fkkuk ,l vks th] t;iqj ij iathc) izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 09@24 varxZr /kkjk 419] 420] 467] 468] 120ch Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk o /kkjk 3] o 10 jktLFkku lkoZtfud ijh{kk ¼HkrhZ esa vuqfpr lk/kuksa dh jksdFkke ds v/;qik;½ 2002 esa vfxze tekur fn;s tkus gsrq izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA
[CRLMB-6683/2024]
[2024:RJ-JP:31117]
(2 of 3)
fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ dk rdZ jgk fd izkFkhZ funksZ"k gS] mldh bl vijk/k esa dksbZ Hkwfedk ugha gS] og vuqla/kku esa lg;ksx djus gsrq rRij gS] vr% vfxze tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh xbZA
fo}ku vfrfjDr egkf/koDrk us vfxze tekur vkosnu dk fojks/k fd;kA
nksuksa i{kksa ds rdksZa ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA
orZeku ekeys esa ;g vkjksi gS fd lgk;d vfHk;ark flfoy izfr;ksxh ijh{kk fnukad 21-05-23 dks vk;ksftr dh x;h Fkh ftlesa okLrfod vH;FkhZ bUnzkt flag ds LFkku ij iSij yhd djokrs gq, vfHk;qDr@izkFkhZ }kjk izos'k i= ,fMV djkrs gq, viuk QksVks yxok;k rFkk okLrfod vH;FkhZ ds LFkku ij viuh mifLFkfr nsrs gq, Meh dsafMMsV ds :i esa ijh{kk nhA ijh{kk dsUnz ij tks vH;FkhZ mifLFkr gqvk mldk QksVks fy;k x;k tks Hkh vfHk;qDr@izkFkhZ dk gksuk crk;k x;k gSA
vfHk;qDr ds fo:) yxk;s x;s vkjksi vR;f/kd xaHkhj gSA ,sls ekeyksa esa xgu o fu"i{k vuqla/kku gksuk visf{kr gSA vU; lg vfHk;qDr dks izdj.k fo'ks"k dh ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks ns[krs gq, fu;fer tekur lqfo/kk nh x;h gS tcfd vfHk;qDr@izkFkhZ dk ;g vkosnu vfxze tekur gsrq /kkjk 438 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds rgr gSA
izdj.k esa miyC/k leLr rF;kRed fLFkfr] vijk/k dh izd`fr ,oa xaHkhjrk dks /;ku esa j[krs gq,] izdj.k ds bl izdze ij ekeys ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk] izkFkhZ dh
vksj ls izLrqr ;g vfxze tekur vkosnu Lohdkj fd;s tkus ;ksX; ugha gSA
ifj.kker% izkFkhZ ijes'oj yky iq= jkedj.k dh vksj ls /kkjk 438 naM izfdz;k lafgrk ds rgr izLrqr ;g vfxze tekur izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd;k tkrk gSA
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
Murari Lal Sharma /26
2 issues framed by the court
To decide whether to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner under Section 438 CrPC despite irregularities in the evidence produced by the prosecution.
Whether the petitioner is a fit and suitable person for granting anticipatory bail.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Prameshvar Lal
State Of Rajasthan
Ravi Kumar Vaishnav
UMA SHANKER VYAS
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
