Allowed

Radheyshyam v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC12 Feb 2024CRLMB/634/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants bail to the petitioner in S.B. Crl. Misc. Bail Application No. 634/2024. The petitioner was previously denied bail pending trial for Section 218 NI Act offences. The court allowed the present application regarding other charges arising from the same incident.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted to the petitioner in connection with the other charges in the pending bail application.

Radheyshyam Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JD:7081]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 634/2024

¶4

Radheyshyam S/o Sohan Lal, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Dabra Police Station Moulasr Dist. Didwana - Kuchaman. (At Present Lodged In Dist. Jail, Nagaur)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tarun Dhaka For Respondent(s) : Mr. Laxman Solanki, PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT

¶11

Order

¶12

12/02/2024

¶13

1- izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls tekur dk ;g vkosnu i= vUrxZr /kkjk 439 n.M izfØ;k lafgrk iqfyl Fkkuk ekSyklj] ftyk MhMokuk dqpkeu esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 218@2023] vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 354] 354?k] 384] 509] 506 Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk ,oa /kkjk 11@12 iksDlks ,DV] 2012 ds ekeys esa izLrqr gqvk gSA 2- geus cgl tekur vkosnu lquh rFkk miyC/k vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;kA

¶14

3- izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds ;ksX; vf/koDrk dh vksj ls ;g rdZ fn;k x;k fd bl ekeys esa ekeys esa vU; lg&vfHk;qDr izeksn gS] ftldh tekur v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk fnukad 24-01-2024 dks yh tk pqdh gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk ekeyk vU; lg&vfHk;qDr izeksn ds leku gh gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds fo:) iwoZ esa ,d izdj.k ntZ gksus ds dkj.k v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk tekur izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd;k x;k FkkA vr% bl vk/kkj ij izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks tekur ij fjgk fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶15

4- blds foijhr ;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd us mDr tekur vkosnu i= dk l[r fojks/k djrs gq, izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds tekur vkosnu i= dks [kkfjt fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶16

5- eSaus mi;qZDr rdkZsa ij euu fd;k rFkk i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;kA i=koyh ds voyksdu ls ;g Li"V gksrk gS fd bl ekeys esa vU; lg&vfHk;qDr

[2024:RJ-JD:7081]

[CRLMB-634/2024]

(2 of 2)

izeksn dh tekur v/khuLFk U;k;ky; ds vkns'k fnukad 24-01-2024 ds }kjk gks pqdh gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk ekeyk vU; lg&vfHk;qDr izeksn ds leku gh gSA

¶21

6- vr% cgl esa mBk;s x;s fcUnqvksa ,oa vfHkys[k ij miyC/k lkexzh dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk] izdj.k ds rF;ksa o ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks ns[krs gq, izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr izrhr gksrk gSaA

¶22

7- ifj.kker% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds tekur vkosnu i= Lohdkj fd;k tkdj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr jk/ks';ke iq= lksguyky] iqfyl Fkkuk ekSyklj] ftyk MhMokuk dqpkeu esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 218@2023 ds ekeys esa fopkj.k U;k;ky; esa viuh fu;fer mifLFkfr ds laca/k esa ,d yk[k :i;s dk eqpydk ,oa ;ksX; v/khuLFk U;k;ky; ds larks’kizn ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks tekur izLrqr dj rLnhd djk ns rks mls bl izdj.k esa tekur ij rqjar fjgk dj fn;k tkosA

¶23

(YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT),J

¶24

60-GauravGehlot/-

Radheyshyam v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Radheyshyam v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manisha Kanwar Vs Surendra Singh

Puran Singh Vs Oswal Singh Sabha through Secretary Prasann Chand

Jagdish Nath Vs Madan Nath

Yudhister Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Vinod Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Sonu @ Mitu Vs State of Rajasthan