Second regular bail application for offences including Sections 323, 341 and 307/34 IPC in FIR No. 173/2023, Jasol. Court granted bail citing compromise entered by injured complainant Kheta Ram and no recovery of weapon.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:10530]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. 2nd Bail Application No. 528/2024
Padma Ram S/o Bhura Ram, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Dharna Dhora, P.S. Siwana District Balotra.
(At Present Lodged At District Jail , Balotra)
----Petitioner
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Dr. Laxman Singh Bhati |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Arun Kumar, Public Prosecutor |
| Mr. Bhoop Singh Chouhan for the complainant |
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
01/03/2024
[2024:RJ-JD:10530]
[CRLMB-528/2024]
(2 of 2)
caused to the injured was so grievous in nature, for which a case under Section 307 of IPC could be registered nor is there any recovery of lathi or weapon from the applicant. Learned counsel further submitted that the parties have entered into a compromise and therefore, the present applicant, who is behind the bars since 04.11.2023 be enlarged on bail.
(DINESH MEHTA),J
11-Mak/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted given the compromise with the injured and absence of recovered weapon despite Section 307 IPC charge.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Padma Ram S/o Bhura Ram
State Of Rajasthan
Kheta Ram S/o Kheema Ram
Dinesh Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
