Allowed

Farred S/O Hanif v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC9 May 2024CRLMB/4791/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan allowed a bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for three accused persons charged with economic offences including cheating, forgery, and cyber crimes, granting bail subject to furnishing bonds and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Accused-petitioners released on bail subject to furnishing personal bond of Rs. 50,000 each and two sureties in Rs. 25,000 each.

Farred S/O Hanif Vs State of Rajasthan — Money Laundering | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:21895]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4791/2024

¶4

Farred S/o Hanif, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Village Gadadwas, Police Station Khoh District Deeg (Raj.) (Presently Confined In District Jail Deeg).

¶5

Farukh S/o Jameel, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Village Gadadwas, Police Station Khoh District Deeg (Raj.) (Presently Confined In District Jail Deeg).

¶6

Rohid S/o Harun, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Village Gadadwas, Police Station Khoh District Deeg (Raj.) (Presently Confined In District Jail Deeg).

¶7

----Petitioners

¶8

Versus

¶9

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶10

----Respondent

¶11

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr.	Vinod Kumar Sharma
For Respondent(s)	: Mr.	Bhawani Shankar Sharma, P.P.

¶12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI

¶13

Order

¶14

09/05/2024

¶15

The instant bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of accused-petitioners in the matter arising out of F.I.R. No.61/2024 registered at Police Station Khoh, District Deeg, for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 413, 419, 420, 467, 471, & 120-B of I.P.C. and Section 66-D I.T. Act.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case, they have nothing to do with the alleged offence and they are behind the bars since 09.03.2024. The other co-accused person has already

[2024:RJ-JP:21895]

[CRLMB-4791/2024]

(2 of 2)

been granted bail by this Court. The case is triable by a Court of Magistrate. Trial of the case is likely to take a long time to conclude, till then, their further incarceration would not serve any fruitful purpose and they are ready and willing to furnish their bail bonds. Therefore, the bail application deserves to be allowed.

¶21

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

¶22

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material made available on record.

¶23

Taking into consideration the submissions put forth and overall facts and circumstances of the case but without commenting upon detailed merits of the case, this Court deems it fit to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.

¶24

Therefore, the bail application is allowed. Accusedpetitioners, namely Farred S/o Hanif, Farukh S/o Jameel & Rohid S/o Harun shall be released on bail, if they are not required in any other case, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Fifty Thousand) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-five Thousand) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any other court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when they are called upon to do so.

¶25

(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J

¶26

SAURABH /06

Farred S/O Hanif v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Farred S/O Hanif v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajendra Kumar @ Raju S/O Shri Sanwarmal Vs State of Rajasthan

Chhittar Mal S/O Bharmal B/C Nai Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Sunit Kumar S/O Late Dutta Prasad B/C Kirar Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramraj Vs Smt Sanjana Devi and Anr.

Devpal Son of Shri Babulal Vs State of Rajasthan

Ravi Goyal S/O Shri Satya Narayan Vs the State of Rajasthan