house and thereafter causing mischief. The petitioner is in custody since 19.03.2024 and trial/investigation of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant vehemently oppose the bail application. 4. Learned counsel for the complainant submits that petitioner along with other co-accused after making unlawful assembly caused fatal injuries with sharp weapon to the injured Mustafa & Shaukat. As a result of injuries caused by the petitioner and other co-accused, Mustafa received as many as eight injuries and out of which seven injuries were found to be with sharp weapon. It is specifically opined by the concerned medical jurists that injury Nos.3 to 7 caused to the injured Mustafa are grievous in nature and inflicted with sharp weapon. Similarly, the other injured Shaukat also received six injuries out of which three injuries were inflicted with a sharp weapon. The injuries caused to the injured were at vital parts. The role of the petitioner has been specifically assigned by both the injured, in their statements recorded under Section 161 of Cr.P.C. The petitioner was also found to be involved in criminal matter bearing FIR No.355/2023, registered at Police Station Kaithun, District Kota for the offences under Section 302 of the IPC, therefore, considering the gravity of the offence, the bail application of accused-petitioner may be dismissed.
