High Court at Jodhpur dismissed the bail application of petitioners who moved to withdraw it to file a fresh application after re-records of statements.
Liberty granted to file fresh bail application after recording of statements of Seizure and Investigating Officers.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1 of 1)
[2024:RJ-JD:20732]
[CRLMB-4446/2024]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4446/2024
----Petitioners
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Dadhich. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Laxman Solanki, PP.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
Order
09/05/2024
Learned counsel representing the petitioners does not want to press the instant bail application at this stage but, he craves leave of the Court to file a fresh bail application after the statements of the Seizure Officer and the Investigating Officer are recorded.
Accordingly, this bail application is dismissed as not pressed with liberty prayed for. It is expected from the trial court that the statements of the Seizure Officer and the Investigating Officer will be recorded on priority basis.
(KULDEEP MATHUR),J
13-Tikam/-
Harpreet Singh
Sandeep Singh
State Of Rajasthan
KULDEEP MATHUR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
