Allowed

Rahul @ Chakku S/O Shabu Khan v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC1 May 2024CRLMB/4283/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court allowed bail application filed by two accused petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in a theft and cheating case, ordering their release on personal bond with sureties and a stipulation to appear on future dates.

What did the court decide?

Accused-petitioners released on bail on personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each, required to appear on subsequent hearing dates.

Rahul @ Chakku S/O Shabu Khan Vs State of Rajasthan — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:20397]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

¶4

4283/2024

¶5

Rahul @ Chakku S/o Shabu Khan, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Samola, Police Station Aravali Vihar, Alwar (Raj.) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Alwar).

¶6

Alaudin @ Alau S/o Subedeen, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Samola, Police Station Aravali Vihar, Alwar (Raj.) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Alwar).

¶7

----Petitioners

¶8

Versus

¶9

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶10

----Respondent

¶11

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gurvindra Singh, Adv. Mr. Harmeet Singh, Adv. For : Mr. Sanjeev Mehla, P.P. Respondent(s)

¶12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order 01/05/2024

¶13

This bail application has been filed by the petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in FIR No.110/2024 registered at Police Station Aravali Vihar, District Alwar for the offence(s) under Section(s) 457 & 380 of IPC.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case. He further

[2024:RJ-JP:20397]

(2 of 2)

[CRLMB-4283/2024]

submits that the accused-petitioners have been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioners may be enlarged on bail.

¶19

Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the bail application.

¶20

Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail.

¶21

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that accused-petitioners namely (1) Rahul @ Chakku S/o Shabu Khan, and (2) Alaudin @ Alau S/o Subedeen shall be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioners shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶22

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶23

YOGESH KUMAR /78

Rahul @ Chakku S/O Shabu Khan v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rahul @ Chakku S/O Shabu Khan v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Devnaresh Panchal S/O Shri Rajendra Prasad Panchal Vs State of Rajasthan

Lekhraj Jat @ Veeru S/O Ganesh Jat Vs State of Rajasthan

Durgaprasad @ Durgesh S/O Balchand Vs State of Rajasthan

Dharamsingh Gurjar S/O Ramprasad Gurjar Vs State of Rajasthan

Kashmir Singh S/O Kalasingh Vs the State of Rajasthan

Mangalsingh S/O Late Mr. Kishan Singh Vs State of Rajasthan