Bail application under Sections 437/439 CrPC was not pressed by counsel who sought liberty to file a fresh application after recording of the victim's statement; the Court dismissed it as not pressed with such liberty.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:20987]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 419/2024
Sohanlal S/o Shri Banwarilal, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Ward No. 32 (Old Ward No. 24), Valmiki Basti Raisinghnagar And Presently R/o Namdev Colony 22 Ps Dhani, Raisingh Nagar, Dist. Anoopgarh (Raj.) (Presently Lodged In Central Jail, Sriganganagar)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Tania Chug For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mahipal Bishnoi, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Order
10/05/2024
(FARJAND ALI),J
7-Samvedana/-
Sohanlal S/o Shri Banwarilal
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
Farjand Ali
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
