Allowed

Dasrath v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC1 Aug 2024CRLMB/4073/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail application under Section 438 CrPC for alleged excise offence. Petitioner argued he was falsely implicated merely as registered owner of a vehicle sold earlier. High Court accepted the plea and released him on anticipatory bail subject to furnishing bail bonds and standard conditions.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted on furnishing Rs.1 lakh solvency and two sureties of Rs.25,000 each with conditions.

Dasrath Vs State of Rajasthan — Anticipatory Bail | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JD:31711]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4073/2024

¶4

Dasrath S/o Shri Gulabchandra, Aged About 28 Years, R/o 28, Bhawani Residency, Panpur, Sabarkata Gujrat.

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Firoz Khan
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. S.K. Mehar,PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT

¶11

Order

¶12

01/08/2024

¶13

01izkFkhZ dh vksj ls ;g vfxze tekur vkosnu vUrxZr /kkjk 438 n.M izfØ;k lafgrk iqfyl Fkkuk ikujok] ftyk mn;iqj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 18@2024] vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 19@54 jktLFkku vkcdkjh vf/kfu;e ds ekeys esa izLrqr gqvk gSA

¶14

02eSaus cgl vfxze tekur vkosnu lquh rFkk miyC/k vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;kA

¶15

03izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds ;ksX; vf/koDrk dk rdZ jgk fd bl izdj.k esa iqfyl dks foØ; ds bdjkj dh izfr nh tk pqdh gSA ftlds eqrkfcd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr }kjk okgu izdk'k pUnz jsxj dks fnukad 16-11-2023 dks foØ; dj fn;k FkkA ?kVuk ds le; okgu vfHk;qDr ds ikWoj ,.M its'ku esa ugha FkkA dsoy iathd`r Lokeh gksus ds vk/kkj ij izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks bl ekeys esa >wBk Qlk;k x;k gSA vr% bl vk/kkj ij izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks vfxze tekur dk ykHk fn, tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶16

04blds foijhr ;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd us vfxze tekur vkosnu dk fojks/k djrs gq, izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr }kjk izLrqr vfxze tekur vkosnu i= [kkfjt fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA lkFk gh ;g Lohdkj fd;k fd bl ekeys esa ,xzhesaV Vw lsy is'k dj j[kk gSA

¶17

05vfxze tekur vkosnu ij fopkj fd;kA

[CRLMB-4073/2024]

[2024:RJ-JD:31711]

(2 of 2)

06cgl esa mBk;s x;s fcUnqvksa ,oa vfHkys[k ij miyC/k lkexzh dks /;ku esa j[krs gq,] izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk tqeZ dh izd`fr o ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa bl U;k;ky; dh jk; esa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks vfxze tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶22

07ifj.kker% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr vfxze tekur izkFkZuk i= vUrxZr /kkjk 438 naM izfØ;k lafgrk Lohdkj dj vkns”k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr n'kjFk iq= xqykcpUnz dks iqfyl Fkkuk ikujok] ftyk mn;iqj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 18@2024 ds izdj.k esa fxj¶rkj djus dh fLFkfr esa fxj¶rkj djus okys vf/kdkjh dh larqf’V vuqlkj ,d yk[k :i;s dk eqpydk ,oa ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks tekur fuEu “krksaZ lfgr is”k djus ij mls vfxze tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tk;s %&

¶23

1- ;g fd izkFkhZ iqfyl }kjk iwNs tkus okys ifjiz”uksa dk mÙkj nsus ds fy, tSls vkSj tc visf{kr gks] miyC/k gksxk]

¶24

2- ;g fd izkFkhZ ml ekeys ds rF;ksa ls voxr fdlh O;fDr dks U;k;ky; ;k iqfyl vf/kdkjh ds le{k fd ,sls rF;ksa dks izdV u djus ds fy, eukus ds okLrs izR;{kr% ;k vizR;{kr% mls dksbZ mRizsj.kk] /kedh ;k opu ugha nsxk]

¶25

3- ;g fd izkFkhZ U;k;ky; dh iwoZ vuqKk ds fcuk Hkkjr ugha NksMs+xkA

¶26

(YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT),J

¶27

111-mayank/-

Dasrath v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dasrath v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Om Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Raman Kumar @ Kali Vs State of Rajasthan

Mukesh Vs State of Rajasthan

Ajay Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Dhanvantri Joshi Vs State of Rajasthan

Somnath @ Sukhbinder Vs State of Rajasthan