The High Court allowed a bail application regarding murder charges where the court noted a family compromise and lack of serious offense, granting bail subject to maintaining the status quo.
Bail granted with a condition to maintain the status quo and to not disclose the provisional freedom.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:7071]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.
388/2024
Shivdayal S/o Batturam, R/o Naroli, Police Station Rudawal, District Bharatpur (Raj.). (At Present Confined In Sub Jail, Bayana)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Timan Singh, Adv. For : Mr. G.S. Rathore, GA-cum-AAG Respondent(s) Mr. Rakesh Babu, Adv.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS
Judgment / Order
12/02/2024
izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls viuh fu;fer tekur gsrq ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= n.M izfdz;k lafgrk dh /kkjk 439 ds vUrxZr iqfyl Fkkuk&:nkoy] Hkjriqj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k& 218@23 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 143] 323] 341] 316] 504 Hkk-na-la- esa is'k fd;k x;k gSA
fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr us rdZ fn;k fd vfHk;qDr funksZ"k gS] mls feF;k :i ls fyIr fd;k x;k gSA ;g Hkh fuosnu fd;k fd ihfMrk rFkk vfHk;qDr nksuksa ,d gh ifjokj ds lnL; gSa] ihfMrk ds Q'kZ ij fxj tkus ls xHkZikr gqvk gS] feF;k vk/kkj ij izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ntZ gqbZ gS rFkk vc
[2024:RJ-JP:7071]
(2 of 3) [CRLMB-388/2024]
ihfMrk }kjk 'kiFk i= }kjk izLrqr dj ;g Lohdkj fd;k gS fd vfHk;qDr }kjk dksbZ ekjihV ugha dh x;h Fkh] egRoiw.kZ vuqla/kku gks pqdk gS rFkk fnukad 18-12-2023 ls vfHkj{kk esa gS] blfy, izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA
fo}ku vfrfjDr egkf/koDrk }kjk vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk dks ns[krs gq, ;g tekur vkosnu [kkfjt fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh] tcfd vf/koDrk ifjoknh us vfHk;qDr dks tekur lqfo/kk fn;s tkus ij vukifRr O;Dr dhA
nksuksa i{kksa dh cgl ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k ij miyC/k lkexzh dk voyksdu fd;kA
orZeku ekeys esa ifjokfn;k ds lkFk ekjihV djus o mlds ifj.kkeLo:i ikap ekg ds xHkZLFk f'k'kq dh e`R;q gksus dk vkjksi gSA
izdj.k ds rF;ksa] ifjfLFkfr;ksa] izLrqr rdksaZ ,oa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vfHkj{kk vof/k rFkk ifjoknh i{k }kjk dksbZ vkifRr ugha fd;s tkus ds rF; dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, izdj.k ds xq.k&nks"kksa ij fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA
ifj.kker% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr f'kon;ky iq= cRrwjke dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj dj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd izkFkhZ bl ekeys esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn] muds U;k;ky; ;k varfjrh U;k;ky; esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mls cqyk;k tk,] mifLFkfr gsrq ,d yk[k :i;s dk cU/k&i= rFkk ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks
(3 of 3)
[2024:RJ-JP:7071] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-388/2024]
lqn`< izfrHkwfr;ka izLrqr dj izekf.kr djkos rks gLrxr izdj.k esa mls tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tk,A
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
Mittal /74
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the complaint was signed in the presence of the petitioner and whether the right to bail had been denied despite family compromise.
Whether the petitioner charges against him are not serious and whether he needs to be in physical presence to face the charge.
Shivdayal S/o Batturam
State of Rajasthan
Uma Shanker Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
