Allowed

Kumbharam @ Baldev S/O Daglaram v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC1 Feb 2024CRLMB/371/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail sought under Section 439 CrPC for arrestee charged in FIR 466/2022 at Police Station Chomu with offences of Sections 420, 409 and 120B IPC. Court granted bail without expressing opinion on merits, subject to furnishing a personal bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail: personal bond Rs.1,00,000 plus two sureties Rs.50,000 each, to trial court's satisfaction.

Kumbharam @ Baldev S/O Daglaram Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:5303]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

¶4

371/2024

¶5

Kumbharam @ Baldev S/o Daglaram, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Village Kaparda, Tehsil Bilada, Police Station Kaparda, District Jodhpur Rural (Raj.) (At Present In Central Jail, Jaipur).

¶6

----Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶9

Ramlal Gared S/o Shri Boduram Gared, R/o Garedo Ki Dhani, Village Biharipura, Police Station Kaladera, Tehsil Amer, District Jaipur (Raj.)

¶10

----Respondents

¶11

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sharma, Adv. For : Mr. Imran Khan, P.P. Respondent(s)

¶12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order 01/02/2024

¶13

This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in FIR No.466/2022 registered at Police Station Chomu, District Jaipur (West) for the offence(s) under Section(s) 420, 409 & 120B of IPC.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits

[2024:RJ-JP:5303]

(2 of 2)

[CRLMB-371/2024]

that the accused-petitioner has been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

¶19

Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the bail application.

¶20

Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶21

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that accused-petitioner Kumbharam @ Baldev S/o Daglaram shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶22

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶23

YOGESH KUMAR /37

Kumbharam @ Baldev S/O Daglaram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kumbharam @ Baldev S/O Daglaram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manjul Indoliya @ Rishi S/O Ashok Kumar Indoliya Vs the State of Rajasthan

Dilip Singh @ Raju S/O Late Bal Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Dilip Singh @ Raju S/O Late Bal Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Azad S/O Rujdar Vs State of Rajasthan

Jonny Bairwa S/O Lt. Sh. Ramji Lal Vs the State of Rajasthan

Rajesh S/O Vishambar Dayal Vs State of Rajasthan