Allowed

Hasan S/O Kanhaiya v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC1 Feb 2024CRLMB/352/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble Justice Narendra Singh Dhaddha allowed an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in connection with offences under Sections 143, 323, 341, 325, 326, 336, 504 and 506 IPC. The court directed the SHO to release the petitioner on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each, subject to standard conditions.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail allowed. Petitioner directed to furnish personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each, subject to conditions of availability for interrogation, non-interferenc

Hasan S/O Kanhaiya Vs State of Rajasthan — Anticipatory Bail | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:5262]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 352/2024

¶4

Hasan S/o Kanhaiya, Resident Of Village Somaka, Police Station Pahari, District Deeg,

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankit Khandelwal, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ganesh Saini, PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA

¶11

Order

¶12

01/02/2024

¶13

The present bail application has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No.99/2022 registered at Police Station Pahari, District Bharatpur for the offence(s) under Sections 143, 323, 341, 336, 354 and 504 IPC (later on offence under Sections 143, 323, 341, 325, 326, 336, 504 and 506 IPC was found to have been made out).

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. In the FIR, no overt-act has been assigned to the petitioner. Sattari @ Sattar had inflicted injury by sharp edged weapon to Iliyas which is grievous in nature. Nothing is to be recovered from the petitioner. So, the petitioner be enlarged on anticipatory bail.

¶15

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶16

Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the petitioner and taking into account the facts and circumstances of

[2024:RJ-JP:5262]

[CRLMB-352/2024]

(2 of 2)

the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this court deems it just and proper to allow the anticipatory bail application.

¶21

Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Pahari, District Bharatpur in F.I.R. No.99/2022 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner Hasan S/o Kanhaiya , he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:-

¶22

(i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

¶23

(ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and

¶24

(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.

¶25

(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J

¶26

Jatin /09

Hasan S/O Kanhaiya v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hasan S/O Kanhaiya v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shriram Gurjar S/O Shri Shyodan Gurjar Vs Mamraj Yadav S/O Shri Kaluram Yadav

Sanjeev Kumar Katta S/O Shri Vishnu Kishor Ji Katta Vs Shri Bhupendra Kumar Yadav

Smt. Manjula Devi Ranka W/O Shri Budhraj Ranka Vs Smt. Rajneesh D/O Late Shri Narender Kumar W/O Shri Jitender Solanki

Parwati and Anr. Vs Mukesh Kumar Sharma and Ors.

Vakil S/O Gaffar Vs State of Rajasthan

Mahaveer Singh Son of Shri Goverdhan Singh, Vs State of Rajasthan