Allowed

Sunil Hankla @ Anandpal S/O Ramdev v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC12 Jan 2024CRLMB/319/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court allowed the bail application filed by the accused under Section 439 Cr.P.C., noting that a co-accused had already been granted bail and the trial would likely take time. The petitioner was enlarged on bail with specific bond and surety conditions.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail on furnishing personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- and two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each.

Sunil Hankla @ Anandpal S/O Ramdev Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:2124]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 319/2024

¶4

Sunil Hankla @ Anandpal S/o Ramdev, Aged About 23 Years, Resident Of Main Chauraha, Jaipur Road, Ghughra, Police Station Civil Lines, Ajmer. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Ajmer)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr.	Aayush Agarwal
For Respondent(s)	: Mr.	Imran Khan,P.P.

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI Order

¶11

12/01/2024

¶12

The instant bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of accused-petitioner against the impugned order dated 06.01.2024 passed by learned Trial Court for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 279, 336 of I.P.C. and 19/54 of Rajasthan Excise Act, in F.I.R. No. 312/2023 registered at Police Station Civil Lines, Ajmer (Rajasthan). Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case, he has nothing to do with the alleged offence and he is behind the bars since 20.12.2023. Counsel further submits that the other co-accused person, namely Monu Gurjar has already been granted bail by this Court vide its order dated 31.08.2023. The case is triable by a Court of Magistrate & the trial of the case is likely to take a long time to conclude, till then, his further incarceration would not serve any

[2024:RJ-JP:2124]

[CRLMB-319/2024]

(2 of 2)

fruitful purpose and he is ready and willing to furnish bail bonds for his release. Therefore, the bail application deserves to be allowed.

¶17

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

¶18

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material made available on record.

¶19

Taking into consideration the submissions put forth and overall facts & circumstances of the case but without commenting upon detailed merits of the case, this Court deems it fit to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.

¶20

Therefore, the bail application is allowed. Accused-petitioner namely Sunil Hankla @ Anandpal S/o Ramdev, shall be released on bail, if he is not required in any other case, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Fifty Thousand) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/(Twenty-five Thousand) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any other court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when he is called upon to do so.

¶21

(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J

¶22

SAURABH /18

Sunil Hankla @ Anandpal S/O Ramdev v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunil Hankla @ Anandpal S/O Ramdev v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr. Mohit Gupta S/O Ballu Kumar @ Balji Vs State of Rajasthan

Jagdish S/O Ramkalyan Vs the State of Rajasthan

Mangal S/O Sugan Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramjilal @ Kada S/O Radheyshyam Vs State of Rajasthan

Vimal Vishwas S/O Shri Vipad Vishwas Vs State of Rajasthan

Sanjay Kumar Kashyap S/O Shri Jhabbu Lal Vs the State of Rajasthan