Anticipatory bail application dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner was absent on two consecutive listing dates and appeared to have lost interest in pursuing the bail application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:26833]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3184/2024
Poonam Chand S/o Bhanwar Lal, Aged About 35 Years, R/o 369, Sonal Apartment, Poata, Jodhpur.
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan through PP
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Nonepresent |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Laxman Solanki,PP |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA PRAKASH SONI
Order
03/07/2024
On 29.05.2024 nobody was present on behalf of the petitioner. Today also no one is present.
It appears that petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting this criminal misc. bail application.
Resultantly, the instant bail application filed under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(RAJENDRA PRAKASH SONI),J
168-suraj/-
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Poonam Chand S/o Bhanwar Lal
State of Rajasthan through PP
Rajendra Prakash Soni
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
