Bail application for offences of murder, kidnapping and disappearance of evidence. Court noted the case rests on circumstantial evidence; key 'last seen' witness Mandeep Kumar's trial statement was yet unrecorded. Bail was declined and the petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:26077]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3069/2024
Gauri Shankar @ Gauri S/o Shri Purn Ram, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Karadwala, Ps Sadul Shahar, Dist Sri Ganganagar, Raj. (Lodged In Jail Sriganganagar)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
| ----Respondent | |
|---|---|
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Durgesh Khatri for Mr. N. K. Sharma |
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Anda Ram Choudhary,PP |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA PRAKASH SONI Order
01/07/2024
[2024:RJ-JD:26077]
[CRLMB-3069/2024]
(2 of 3)
PW-8, Pratap Singh has also denied furnishing of any information by anyone.
(3 of 3)
[2024:RJ-JD:26077]
[CRLMB-3069/2024]
Kumar has yet not been recorded during the trial, therefore this Court is not inclined to grant benefit of bail to the applicant.
(RAJENDRA PRAKASH SONI),J
3-DivyaTak/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether regular bail under Section 439 CrPC should be granted to the petitioner in FIR 54/2023 involving offences under Sections 364, 302 and 201 IPC.
Whether the case rests on circumstantial evidence given hostile statements by brothers of the deceased.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Gauri Shankar @ Gauri S/o Shri Purn Ram
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
Rajendra Prakash Soni
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
