Allowed

Suresh Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC14 Mar 2024CRLMB/2986/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Jodhpur allowed a bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for a petitioner accused of crimes under the IPC, granting bail with a personal bond and sureties due to the length of the anticipated trial.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail by executing a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge.

Suresh Singh Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JD:12111]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2986/2024

¶4

Suresh Singh S/o Uka Singh, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Nagani, Ps Anadra, Dist Sirohi. (Lodged In Dist Jail Sirohi)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Umesh Kant Vyas
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Anil Joshi, GA cum AAG assisted
	byMr. Rajat Chharparwal

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG

¶11

Order

¶12

14/03/2024

¶13

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.57/2022 registered at Police Station Anadra, District Sirohi for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302 and 120-B of the IPC.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that similar situated co-accused persons viz., Narpat Singh, Doongar Singh, Man Singh, Parbat Singh and Indar Singh have already been granted bail by this Court and the case of the present petitioner is not distinguishable. Challan of the case has already been presented. The petitioner is in the judicial custody since 25.03.2022 and the trial of the case will take sufficiently long time. Therefore, the benefit of bail may be granted to the accused-petitioner.

(2 of 2)

[2024:RJ-JD:12111]

[CRLMB-2986/2024]

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶19

I have considered the arguments advanced before me and gone through the material available on record.

¶20

Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to release the petitioner on bail.

¶21

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner – Suresh Singh S/o Uka Singh shall be enlarged on bail in FIR No.57/2022 registered at Police Station Anadra, District Sirohi provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.

¶22

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J

¶23

99-Rashi/-

Suresh Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suresh Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ritesh Vs State of Rajasthan

Piyush Vs State of Rajasthan

Samsudeen @ Samsu Khan Son of Shri Mohammad Hasan Vs State of Rajasthan

Dewa Ram and Anr. Vs State

Lal Chand Vs State

Kaka @ Amarjeet Singh Vs State