Single judge order on bail application. Court cancelled bail granted in absentia, observing petitioner was an absconder. Bail was revoked with an undertaking for fixed bail bonds of Rs. 50,000/monthly and Rs. 25,000/release or monthly.
Bail order granted in absentia set aside. Petitioner ordered to furnish security bond.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:7081]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 298/2024
Suresh Kumar Gurjar S/o Ghanshyam Gurjar, R/o Indra Colony, Vijay Nagar, District Beawar (Raj.) (At Present In Sub Jail, Beawar).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mahendra Meena, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Order
12/02/2024
izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr lqjs'k dqekj xqtZj dh vksj ls v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns”k fnukad 21-12-2023 ds fo:) ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= n.M izfdz;k lafgrk dh /kkjk 439 ds vUrxZr iqfyl Fkkuk fct;uxj] ftyk vtesj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k& 60@2023 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 148] 149] 341] 440] 336] 506 ,oa 307 Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk esa fu;fer tekur iznku fd, tkus ds laca/k esa izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA
cgl lquh xbZA
;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ dks ekeys esa >wBk Qalk;k x;k gS] og funksZ"k gSA izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr fnukad 31-10-2023 ls vfHkj{kk esa gSA izdj.k esa vuqla/kku iw.kZ gksdj vkjksi i= is'k fd;k tk pqdk gSA ekeys dh vUoh{kk esa le; yxsxkA mudk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd izdj.k ds lg&vfHk;qDrx.k HkS:yky] xksfoUn] eksbuqn~nhu dk tekur izkFkZuk i= blh
[2024:RJ-JP:7081]
[CRLMB-298/2024]
(2 of 2)
U;k;ky; }kjk rFkk vU; lg&vfHk;qDrx.k Mkypan] 'kks;c [kku ds tekur izkFkZuki= led{k cSap }kjk iwoZ esa gh Lohdkj fd, tk pqds gSa] izkFkhZ dk ekeyk mlls fHkUu ugha gSA vr% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dks tekur ij fjgk fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;k x;kA
fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us izkFkZuk i= dk fojks/k fd;k ,oa vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk dks ns[krs gq, izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;k x;kA
nksuksa i{kksa ds vf/koDrkx.k }kjk j[ks x, rdksZa&fordksZa ij euu fd;kA izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr fnukad 31-10-2023 ls vfHkj{kk esa gS rFkk izdj.k ds lg&vfHk;qDrx.k ds tekur vkosnu bl U;k;ky; ,oa led{k cSap }kjk iwoZ esa gh Lohdkj fd, tk pqds gaSA izdj.k dh vUoh{kk esa le; yxus dh laHkkouk ls badkj ugha fd;k tk ldrkA vr% izdj.k dh rF;kRed fLFkfr] izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vfHkj{kk vof/k] vUoh{kk esa yxus okys le; ,oa vU; ifjfLFkfr;ksa ij fopkj djus ds ckn] izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ vafre jk; O;Dr fd, fcuk izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dks tekur dh lqfo/kk fn;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr izrhr gksrk gSA
ifj.kker% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS vkSj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr bl ekeys esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn 50]000@&:i, ¼ v{kjs ipkl gtkj :i;s½ dk O;fDrxr ca/ki= o 25]000&25]000@&:i, ¼ v{kjs iPphl&iPphl gtkj :i,½ dh nks lqn`<+ ,oa fo'oluh; izfrHkwfr;ka bl vk”k; dh izLrqr dj ns fd og izdj.k ds fopkj.k ds nkSjku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k izR;sd rkjh[k is”kh ij mifLFkr gksrk jgsxk rks izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr lqjs'k dqekj xqtZj iq= Jh ?ku';ke xqtZj dks ¼;fn og vU; fdlh izdj.k esa okafNr u gksa rks½ vfoyEc tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tkosA
(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J
MANOJ ADWANI/27
3 issues framed by the court
Whether to cancel bail granted to the petitioner in a criminal case under Sections 148, 149, 341, 440, 336, 506 and 307 IPC.
Whether to impose stringent conditions for grant of bail similar to impugned order, given petitioner is an absconder.
Whether the order granting bail to the petitioner in the absentia needs to be quashed.
Suresh Kumar Gurjar
State Of Rajasthan
Vinod Kumar Bharwani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
